Has to do with Singleheader games. Looks like this past week FOX went with the late game in Boston to avoid the Pats game. Providence showed the early game due to the fixation with Brady.I've noticed that a few of the NFL games airing on these 2 Fox affiliates are not the same. I wonder why this would be.
The Pats game is on Monday Night Football so Boston must show it on local TV (only the primary market in each team can show it). That seems odd as usually its WCVB and WMUR that carry the games since they are owned by Hearst (and they get first right of refusal since ESPN is partially owned by Hearst). Guess the refused to buy the rights and WBTS-LD bought it. I know here in Minneapolis WCCO CBS O&O had the rights to Vikes ESPN games for a few years (we do not have a Heart station in Mpls)I also noticed that WBTS will be airing Monday Night Football next week, but WJAR isn't. Isn't that usually on ABC and not NBC?
Local MNF rights don't necessarily go to the local ABC affiliate. They're available to the highest bidder. Also, despite Foxboro being roughly equidistant between Boston and Providence, it is still in the Boston TV market. The game can only be broadcast OTA in the two teams' home markets, in this case, Boston and Chicago. Adjacent markets, such as Providence and Rockford IL, respectively, are stuck with ESPN along with the rest of the country.I've noticed that a few of the NFL games airing on these 2 Fox affiliates are not the same. I wonder why this would be. I also noticed that WBTS will be airing Monday Night Football next week, but WJAR isn't. Isn't that usually on ABC and not NBC?
Do Providence cable systems black out the highest-bidder Boston channels for MNF games featuring the Patriots? Of course, there's nothing the NFL or ESPN can do about viewers in the northern part of the Providence market receiving the Boston channels OTA, which is still possible, I'm pretty sure, even in the digital age.Local MNF rights don't necessarily go to the local ABC affiliate. They're available to the highest bidder. Also, despite Foxboro being roughly equidistant between Boston and Providence, it is still in the Boston TV market. The game can only be broadcast OTA in the two teams' home markets, in this case, Boston and Chicago. Adjacent markets, such as Providence and Rockford IL, respectively, are stuck with ESPN along with the rest of the country.
The game might not attract much interest in Las Vegas or Denver, given the way those teams' seasons have gone.Fox can air only one game this week since CBS has the doubleheader. The Pats play early and will air on CBS all over New England. The CBS late game is Dallas/Minnesota in most of the country. Since Fox can air only one game, it has to be the late Las Vegas/Denver game in Boston, since they can't air a game opposite the Pats when they're home.
The rest of New England is airing the Lions/Giants game probably because there is more local interest. I doubt that Boston has any interest in the Raiders or the Broncos, but they have no choice in the matter. It's the only late game airing on Fox.
Not sure if I'll be seeing it on Xfinity or YouTube TV here in the Hanover NH/White River Jct VT area. We get all Pats games on the OTA/cable networks, but WFXT is not on either Xfinity or YouTube TV. Anyone know what the situation is with this Pats game on the outer fringe of the team's market?For the Amazon Thursday game on Dec.1 between the Bills and Patriots, WFXT is airing the game in the Boston area. However, in Bristol County, WFXT is only available in SD due to the fact Bristol County is part of the Providence DMA. When is Fox programming is on, it is blocked. This game is not a Fox national program, it should not be blocked. It is difficult to watch in SD. So to bypass this, I will go off cable and watch over the air with rabbit ears. The FCC needs to reassign Bristol County to Boston DMA so we can get all Boston channels in SD and HD. This problem also affects NBC10 Boston which is not even on in Bristol County. We are stuck with WJAR.
Due to ani siphoning laws cable/streaming games must be shown in the team’s PRIMARY market. Since Foxboro is in the Boston DMA it must be shown there. All other markets (no matter how close it is) cannot show itI never understand why a local Boston station can show a Patriots game that is nationally on a subscription service but not a Providence station.
The Green Bay situation is because they played games in Milwaukee for decades. It’s an old grandfathered ruleWhen the Green Bay Packers are on MNF or TNF, an OTA station in both the Green Bay and Milwaukee DMAs can show the game. Gillette Stadium is about halfway between Boston and Providence. It's so weird that a Pats game will be on "regular cable" in Concord NH and Brattleboro VT but not in Providence.
Hearst decided to use its ‘first right of refusal’ option this year. Same with ABC owned stations.And lastly, the Monday 12/12 game at Arizona is slated to be simulcast on WBZ. Why would WCVB refuse not one, but TWO MNF Patriots games? The market's "news leader" will be the only Big 4 station in Boston to NOT air a Patriots game this season!
Tell it to King Roger. With the exception of the grandfathered Milwaukee, the hard fast rule is that the game is aired OTA in the two teams' home markets only. Period.Comcast in Bristol County just committed a major blunder. They are blocking the WFXT broadcast of Thursday night football between the Bills and Patriots even though it is not a national Fox program. No one in Bristol County and in Providence cannot see the game despite being close to Gillette Stadium unless you have Amazon Prime or can watch WFXT over the air which I am doing, Something has to be done about this issue.
Comcast in Bristol County just committed a major blunder. They are blocking the WFXT broadcast of Thursday night football between the Bills and Patriots even though it is not a national Fox program. No one in Bristol County and in Providence cannot see the game despite being close to Gillette Stadium unless you have Amazon Prime or can watch WFXT over the air which I am doing, Something has to be done about this issue.