• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

VH format progress

Re: WRONG!

If I can find it you can. As far as research, yes, well aware of it, in fact, it's what got radio where it's at today. Great stuff when used properly, bad stuff when read to justify what one wants to do.

> > It's not my job to tell you your world is falling in
> around
> > you. In fact, if this is what you live for you should just
>
> > jump now.
>
> Your the one the said "their stations are worth close to
> HALF OF WHAT THEY PAID ON PAPER now." Don't try to skirt
> away from the subject. Prove what you said. How about you do
> a little bit of work this time. Its called research, ever
> hear of it?
>
> Cheers!
>
 
Re: more WRONG!

Hey, nice to see your head up from under the desk.

> Except you hosers don't ever mention that the Jack/V.H.
> format is measured as successful by RADIO LISTENERS in most
> markets where the format is on.
>
> Critics don't determine who's successful- listeners do and
> listeners (according to the ratings) are giving the VH
> format a big thumbs-up in most markets.
>
> Talk about leg humping and taliwhackers all you want- radio
> listeners could care less what you think and I'm with THEM.
>
>
>
> > It's also like some stanking freak who instead of taking a
>
> > bath uses a ton of cologne to mask the stink.
> >
> > It's nice to see not everyone's riding taliwhacker RR
> while
> > intoxicated on Kool-Aid.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > > CBS reminds me of my hillbilly neighbors. And JACK
> > reminds
> > > me of the coat of paint they put on their aluminum
> siding
> > > last summer. For awhile, it looked better than what was
>
> > > there, but eventually, it will look like crap again.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, in radio's case as in my case, lack of
> > > wherewithall reflects poorly on adjacent properties.
> > >
> >
>
 
more WRONG!

Always the psycho, whacko-perv comments AND always avoiding FACTS- you are consistent.

Your denial and your porno reference both reveal volumes.



> Hey, nice to see your head up from under the desk.
>
> > Except you hosers don't ever mention that the Jack/V.H.
> > format is measured as successful by RADIO LISTENERS in
> most markets where the format is on.
> >
> > Critics don't determine who's successful- listeners do and
> > listeners (according to the ratings) are giving the VH
> > format a big thumbs-up in most markets.
> >
> > Talk about leg humping and taliwhackers all you want-
> radio listeners could care less what you think and I'm with THEM.
> >
> >
> >
> > > It's also like some stanking freak who instead of taking
> a bath uses a ton of cologne to mask the stink.
> It's nice to see not everyone's riding taliwhacker RR
> > while intoxicated on Kool-Aid.
> > >
> > > Cheers.
> > >
> > > > CBS reminds me of my hillbilly neighbors. And JACK
> > > reminds
> > > > me of the coat of paint they put on their aluminum
> > siding
> > > > last summer. For awhile, it looked better than what
> was
> >
> > > > there, but eventually, it will look like crap again.
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately, in radio's case as in my case, lack of
> > > > wherewithall reflects poorly on adjacent properties.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
 
Re: more WRONG!

You's a good boy defending your master here. The last time I checked RATINGS don't determine anything, they're irrelevant if the station is billing and in CBS's case, Jack's case (chicago, NYC) and other markets where extraps show some erosions occuring. Don't let facts and reality get in your way.

Wal-Mart's got a sale on choo-choo goo if you need it.

I know, I know, I'm a sinner blah blah blah.




> Always the psycho, whacko-perv comments AND always avoiding
> FACTS- you are consistent.
>
> Your denial and your porno reference both reveal volumes.
>
>
>
> > Hey, nice to see your head up from under the desk.
> >
> > > Except you hosers don't ever mention that the Jack/V.H.
> > > format is measured as successful by RADIO LISTENERS in
> > most markets where the format is on.
> > >
> > > Critics don't determine who's successful- listeners do
> and
> > > listeners (according to the ratings) are giving the VH
> > > format a big thumbs-up in most markets.
> > >
> > > Talk about leg humping and taliwhackers all you want-
> > radio listeners could care less what you think and I'm
> with THEM.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > It's also like some stanking freak who instead of
> taking
> > a bath uses a ton of cologne to mask the stink.
> > It's nice to see not everyone's riding taliwhacker RR
> > > while intoxicated on Kool-Aid.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers.
> > > >
> > > > > CBS reminds me of my hillbilly neighbors. And JACK
> > > > reminds
> > > > > me of the coat of paint they put on their aluminum
> > > siding
> > > > > last summer. For awhile, it looked better than what
>
> > was
> > >
> > > > > there, but eventually, it will look like crap again.
>
> > > > >
> > > > > Unfortunately, in radio's case as in my case, lack
> of
> > > > > wherewithall reflects poorly on adjacent properties.
>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
 
ratings don't determine anything?

> You's a good boy defending your master here. The last time I
> checked RATINGS don't determine anything

Wow, I can't believe you actually said that.

, they're irrelevant
> if the station is billing and in CBS's case, Jack's case
> (chicago, NYC) and other markets where extraps show some
> erosions occuring. Don't let facts and reality get in your
> way.

I don't understand what you were trying to say since the above statement doesn't make since, but I guess you are saying billing is the main part of the fate of a station. Obviously thats why CBS flipped TO Jack, so it can bill better.

YOU are the one that needs to check the facts and check reality. You're letting your dream world get in the way.
>
 
ratings

I believe he/she said that. If it's bitter, ignorant or in-denial, it fits the source.

>
> Wow, I can't believe you actually said that.
>
> they're irrelevant if the station is billing and in CBS's case, Jack's case
> > (chicago, NYC) and other markets where extraps show some
> > erosions occuring. Don't let facts and reality get in your way.
>
> I don't understand what you were trying to say since the
> above statement doesn't make since, but I guess you are
> saying billing is the main part of the fate of a station.
> Obviously thats why CBS flipped TO Jack, so it can bill better.
>
> YOU are the one that needs to check the facts and check
> reality. You're letting your dream world get in the way.
> >
>
 
Re: more WRONG!

Seems like you know more about clean up than radio.
What do you really do to earn income. And, no I am
not looking for a date.

Still - this is RI entertainment at it's best.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.
Back
Top Bottom