Re: more WRONG!
You's a good boy defending your master here. The last time I checked RATINGS don't determine anything, they're irrelevant if the station is billing and in CBS's case, Jack's case (chicago, NYC) and other markets where extraps show some erosions occuring. Don't let facts and reality get in your way.
Wal-Mart's got a sale on choo-choo goo if you need it.
I know, I know, I'm a sinner blah blah blah.
> Always the psycho, whacko-perv comments AND always avoiding
> FACTS- you are consistent.
>
> Your denial and your porno reference both reveal volumes.
>
>
>
> > Hey, nice to see your head up from under the desk.
> >
> > > Except you hosers don't ever mention that the Jack/V.H.
> > > format is measured as successful by RADIO LISTENERS in
> > most markets where the format is on.
> > >
> > > Critics don't determine who's successful- listeners do
> and
> > > listeners (according to the ratings) are giving the VH
> > > format a big thumbs-up in most markets.
> > >
> > > Talk about leg humping and taliwhackers all you want-
> > radio listeners could care less what you think and I'm
> with THEM.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > It's also like some stanking freak who instead of
> taking
> > a bath uses a ton of cologne to mask the stink.
> > It's nice to see not everyone's riding taliwhacker RR
> > > while intoxicated on Kool-Aid.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers.
> > > >
> > > > > CBS reminds me of my hillbilly neighbors. And JACK
> > > > reminds
> > > > > me of the coat of paint they put on their aluminum
> > > siding
> > > > > last summer. For awhile, it looked better than what
>
> > was
> > >
> > > > > there, but eventually, it will look like crap again.
>
> > > > >
> > > > > Unfortunately, in radio's case as in my case, lack
> of
> > > > > wherewithall reflects poorly on adjacent properties.
>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>