That would be a bad thing IMHO.grich said:BDR is reporting Sine Systems is closing tomorrow for good.
That's a great perspective...it hurts, but I needed to read that.WNTIRadio said:Unfortunately, there were deaths in the family that contributed to the demise of Sine.
I think the other half of the equation was that Sine was behind the times when it comes to some products. The RFC1/B is an awesome dial up remote control. Bulletproof. But with transmitters having web servers in them, lots of other options for remote controls that log automatically and can email and text you, the RFC1/B was lacking in features for a modern transmitter site. If you put one in now, most likely it's running in parallel with another remote... not really a cost effective option. At the very least, an ethernet interface with built in web browser that plugged in to the RFC1/B would have been a good start, and would have made configuration a lot faster, with the ability to save and restore entire sites.
Things like a telephone time and temperature unit also became fast obsolete when everyone has a GPS enabled phone that gives you the exact time, the temperature and forecast anywhere in the world, and just about anything else you can think of.
It's sad to see them go, but it's also a reminder that just because your products were cutting edge 20+ years ago doesn't mean you stop innovating. If Orban, Omnia or Wheatstone were like Sine, we would still have 8100's, Cutting Edge Unity's, A500 boards and an equalized 15k pair running up to the transmitter.
I will miss the Three Stooges sound effects though. I would always laugh when a transmitter called me and went "nyuck nyuck woo woo woo BONK" and then told me about a serious problem. Made it easier to deal with at 3am!
WNTIRadio said:Unfortunately, there were deaths in the family that contributed to the demise of Sine.
I think the other half of the equation was that Sine was behind the times when it comes to some products. The RFC1/B is an awesome dial up remote control. Bulletproof. But with transmitters having web servers in them, lots of other options for remote controls that log automatically and can email and text you, the RFC1/B was lacking in features for a modern transmitter site. If you put one in now, most likely it's running in parallel with another remote... not really a cost effective option. At the very least, an ethernet interface with built in web browser that plugged in to the RFC1/B would have been a good start, and would have made configuration a lot faster, with the ability to save and restore entire sites.
But not everyone has one of these super dyno-whopping transmitters and still need contact closures and analog sampling. Looks like I'll be ordering more of the Broadcast Tools remotes then.
rfburns said:The BT remote doesn't have the clock/calendar feature that the Sine remote has... does it?
RFB
WNTIRadio said:But not everyone has one of these super dyno-whopping transmitters and still need contact closures and analog sampling. Looks like I'll be ordering more of the Broadcast Tools remotes then.
No, but it's nice to be able to see the ol' CCA on the web too. Have one with a MAC hooked up to it, and I can view everything online or dial in. Plenty of analog sampling and closures. Ditto for another site with an ARC Plus. And another with a BTools WVRC-8.
Bengalsfan said:That's all well and good, IF you can get internet access at your transmitter site. Half of my sites, AT&T laughed at me when I asked about internet feeds.
That's all well and good, IF you can get internet access at your transmitter site. Half of my sites, AT&T laughed at me when I asked about internet feeds.