Adam Rivers said:
If I am ever fortunate enough to program in a larger market, I will take the aggressive, custom for my situation, Z100 approach. It's effective and proven to work extremely successfully. CHR is supposed to be the in touch with what's cool and what's hip format... and that's what Z100 is, and why I think it's so successful. There are many CHRs that I fall asleep to because they're so behind on the game, and it reflects in their ratings.
Listeners are a lot more in tune with things and new music then people think they are - and unfortunately most of radio management has forgotten about the listener, the only reason they get a paycheck in the first place. That being said, I base very little if anything on phone calls, because only a small portion of your audience calls the radio station. If there's a pattern noticed, though, it is noted when making category changes and decisions.
And again...I ask the question...what is being used to suggest that taking a chance on brand new, unproven music in mass quantities is helping? If you don't have research, and don't use phones...what are you using? Honest question. What are you doing other than simply guessing? What if you're wrong...and how do you know when you are?
It's like throwing spaghetti at the wall to see if it sticks, only you have no wall. Or, worse yet, your wall is your ratings, which are 3 months behind. So, you're basing whether something was a hit for you 3 months ago, now that it's already too late, and amongst what could be a lot of other factors (bad in-tab, diary placement, marketing, promotions, etc).
Not picking on you, Adam...just seen this argument a lot of times, and have yet to see a response that offers any answers. The argument states that CHR should be hip and cool, yet you base it on nothing other than one or two programmers (who are 90% likely to NOT even be in the demo) guessing at what they believe will be hits, while hiding behind "well...I know my market." If we can agree on that, then how is that the "cutting edge?" Two non-demo dudes telling their audience what they should like? Sure sounds worse to me than my suggestions.
andreajesus said:
now that you put it that way, Roger - how can i dispute that?? not everyone is Z100...
Andrea
That's why I said they didn't count.
I think that, if every CHR had the same (or even similar) options like they do, they could be as idealistically "cutting edge" as everyone wants the format to be. But realistically, we know that's not happening anytime soon.