Al Timiter said:RIP Drake. Enjoyed watching you and your bandmates on "Where the Action Is" and listening to and dancing to those incredible records. Can anyone tell me definitively if Drake played on "Him or Me, What's it gonna' be?" That's some bitching guitar work there.
Al Timiter said:Just remembered: I read somewhere that Paul Revere and the Raiders was the first "rock and roll" act signed to Columbia records...under the strong objection by Mitch Miller.
radioman148 said:Al Timiter said:Just remembered: I read somewhere that Paul Revere and the Raiders was the first "rock and roll" act signed to Columbia records...under the strong objection by Mitch Miller.
Good old Mitch. He sure hated rock & roll in the early days.
RicoGregg said:radioman148 said:Al Timiter said:Just remembered: I read somewhere that Paul Revere and the Raiders was the first "rock and roll" act signed to Columbia records...under the strong objection by Mitch Miller.
Good old Mitch. He sure hated rock & roll in the early days.
I interviewed Mitch Miller for a San Diego station in the mid-70s. I asked him about his thoughts of Rock and Roll, and basically, what he said was that he didn't necessarily hate it, but was very selective in who and what he liked.
I then asked who he did like, and without hesitation, he said Chicago. He said that they were the best thing in Rock, and that they would have been very popular in the Big Band Era. He said that he was a big fan of theirs.
radioman148 said:RicoGregg said:radioman148 said:Al Timiter said:Just remembered: I read somewhere that Paul Revere and the Raiders was the first "rock and roll" act signed to Columbia records...under the strong objection by Mitch Miller.
Good old Mitch. He sure hated rock & roll in the early days.
I interviewed Mitch Miller for a San Diego station in the mid-70s. I asked him about his thoughts of Rock and Roll, and basically, what he said was that he didn't necessarily hate it, but was very selective in who and what he liked.
I then asked who he did like, and without hesitation, he said Chicago. He said that they were the best thing in Rock, and that they would have been very popular in the Big Band Era. He said that he was a big fan of theirs.
From what I heard Mitch hated Rock when it first started and then softened his stance.
hornet61 said:radioman148 said:RicoGregg said:radioman148 said:Al Timiter said:Just remembered: I read somewhere that Paul Revere and the Raiders was the first "rock and roll" act signed to Columbia records...under the strong objection by Mitch Miller.
Good old Mitch. He sure hated rock & roll in the early days.
I interviewed Mitch Miller for a San Diego station in the mid-70s. I asked him about his thoughts of Rock and Roll, and basically, what he said was that he didn't necessarily hate it, but was very selective in who and what he liked.
I then asked who he did like, and without hesitation, he said Chicago. He said that they were the best thing in Rock, and that they would have been very popular in the Big Band Era. He said that he was a big fan of theirs.
From what I heard Mitch hated Rock when it first started and then softened his stance.
Maybe the late John Hammond intervened on the Raiders behalf, he had a lot of Juice by the mid-sixites at Columbia
My hearing has gotten band I can't tell the opening riff to Louie,Louie is piano or Levin on guitar or both?
Silkie said:I don't think that is necessarily your hearing, even if you are losing some hearing. Oftentimes when I am listening to the radio - especially on the Internet - a good deal of the oldies only hit one speaker. You miss vocals and everything else. Probably the same way on the radio too. I'm tellin' ya, even with a little bit of a crackle records just sound better an awful lot of the time. After I got all I wanted out of the Sharp with the 5 CD changer I gave it to somebody and kept my record player - with a CD player connected to the auxillary jack. No prob.
radioman148 said:Silkie said:I don't think that is necessarily your hearing, even if you are losing some hearing. Oftentimes when I am listening to the radio - especially on the Internet - a good deal of the oldies only hit one speaker. You miss vocals and everything else. Probably the same way on the radio too. I'm tellin' ya, even with a little bit of a crackle records just sound better an awful lot of the time. After I got all I wanted out of the Sharp with the 5 CD changer I gave it to somebody and kept my record player - with a CD player connected to the auxillary jack. No prob.
You make a good point. Even though my hearing is lousy, the mixes on many of the later CDs were far different than the original 45s.
Silkie said:radioman148 said:Silkie said:I don't think that is necessarily your hearing, even if you are losing some hearing. Oftentimes when I am listening to the radio - especially on the Internet - a good deal of the oldies only hit one speaker. You miss vocals and everything else. Probably the same way on the radio too. I'm tellin' ya, even with a little bit of a crackle records just sound better an awful lot of the time. After I got all I wanted out of the Sharp with the 5 CD changer I gave it to somebody and kept my record player - with a CD player connected to the auxillary jack. No prob.
You make a good point. Even though my hearing is lousy, the mixes on many of the later CDs were far different than the original 45s.
Right-o. Somewhere off in the left channel or right channel you hear faint backup. It's ridiculous how new and improved works, no?
radioman148 said:Silkie said:radioman148 said:Silkie said:I don't think that is necessarily your hearing, even if you are losing some hearing. Oftentimes when I am listening to the radio - especially on the Internet - a good deal of the oldies only hit one speaker. You miss vocals and everything else. Probably the same way on the radio too. I'm tellin' ya, even with a little bit of a crackle records just sound better an awful lot of the time. After I got all I wanted out of the Sharp with the 5 CD changer I gave it to somebody and kept my record player - with a CD player connected to the auxillary jack. No prob.
You make a good point. Even though my hearing is lousy, the mixes on many of the later CDs were far different than the original 45s.
Right-o. Somewhere off in the left channel or right channel you hear faint backup. It's ridiculous how new and improved works, no?
New & improved isn't always better.
Al Timiter said:RIP Drake. Enjoyed watching you and your bandmates on "Where the Action Is" and listening to and dancing to those incredible records. Can anyone tell me definitively if Drake played on "Him or Me, What's it gonna' be?" That's some bitching guitar work there.