To address the query, the reason HobbyBroadcaster.net isn't loaded with tons of photos (yet) is because a text-rich site is quick loading and doesn't bog down as much. I do plan on having more pictures, mostly in the galleries of featured broadcasters as well as with product reviews, etc.
I understand the "eye candy" appeal factor and I also like it, but I also don't like long page loading times. I know I can certainly play with photo formats to make them less of a load on the site but I also want them to be good quality as well. I suppose I'm a bit anal about it all.
Give it time and I will start to add more glitz to the site. First and foremost I want it to be a very informative resource site for both the novice and serious Part 15 microcaster. I fully understand that pictures convey things that text simply can't but I hope I can strike a happy balance for everybody.
I understand the "eye candy" appeal factor and I also like it, but I also don't like long page loading times. I know I can certainly play with photo formats to make them less of a load on the site but I also want them to be good quality as well. I suppose I'm a bit anal about it all.
Give it time and I will start to add more glitz to the site. First and foremost I want it to be a very informative resource site for both the novice and serious Part 15 microcaster. I fully understand that pictures convey things that text simply can't but I hope I can strike a happy balance for everybody.