And how much of that boost in viewership will inadvertently get siphoned off to Sinclair's WJAR-10 due to this ill conceived re-branding?Wait until the Winter Olympics start. NBC 10 Boston's ratings might change.
And how much of that boost in viewership will inadvertently get siphoned off to Sinclair's WJAR-10 due to this ill conceived re-branding?Wait until the Winter Olympics start. NBC 10 Boston's ratings might change.
And how much of that boost in viewership will inadvertently get siphoned off to Sinclair's WJAR-10 due to this ill conceived re-branding?
How many Boston-area viewers get both stations, and which one do the cable/satellite companies put on Channel 10? Over the air, isn't NBC Boston on either Channel 8.1 or 60.1?
Deja vu San Francisco all over again? I thought they'd learned their lesson with KNTV, calling it NBC 3 for their cable position instead of NBC 11 when they took it over.
That's one thing I've never understood--why couldn't KNTV been placed on cable 11 in the first place? Especially now, since Comcast owns the cable company AND the station.
Probably because they wanted to be nearer to the other Bay Area stations: Fox on 2, NBC on 3, CBS on 5, and ABC on 7 (they couldn't displace the former NBC station, KRON Channel 4). But now that we no longer use rotary-switch tuners, and haven't for 30+ years, I don't know what the big deal is. It's just as easy to punch up 11 as it is 3.
I’ve read various analyses of why the newest TV station in town, NBC Boston, is having trouble with ratings. There’s all this speculation about how it takes time to build an audience from scratch. But it’s pretty obvious to me that the main reason they’re struggling is because by the time they got around to branding their weather team, all the variations of “Storm [fill-in-the-blank]” were taken. So they call it Early Warning Weather.
Early Warning Weather? What good is that? To appropriately cover weather in Boston, you are expected to scare the hell out of people, if only subconsciously. At the very least, you need Storm in your title.
Isn't Sinclair after WTIC Fox61, the Tribune owned Hartford Fox affiliate. They can't own that and WVIT NBC Connecticut.It is safe to say one year in that NBC Boston has been a trainwreck.
They decided that the new channel would take over NECN's slots on Xfinity systems (10, 810) instead of dealing with local access channels in SD and WLVI which is 808.
NBC 8 would have created less confusion south and west of the city with WJAR which is Channel 10 and also happens to be NBC.
They are hampered with a studio carved out at NECN that gives the newscasts a cable access look. That will be resolved when they move to Needham in 2019.
I have heard that NBC/Comcast has talked to Sinclair on a trade with NBC offering Hartford for Providence but Sinclair wants San Diego instead.
I think a year later most are surprised that WHDH-7 has done much better than expected and NBC Boston has gained zero traction in any daypart for local news.
Isn't Sinclair after WTIC Fox61, the Tribune owned Hartford Fox affiliate. They can't own that and WVIT NBC Connecticut.
I could never receive a good signal of channel 22 in the analog days from my old place in New Britain (southern Hartford County). I only got a mere blip from WGGB-TV (ABC) channel 40 once in the digital age. Never anything digital from channel 22 or WGBY-TV (PBS) channel 57 from Springfield either.
I've never been to Belchertown, MA so I can't speak for it.
18 (UNI) still transmit from there.
Mount Greylock is a natural to be a site since it's the highest point in Massachusetts. However, with it being in Berkshire County, it's placed at the edge of the Albany/Schenectady TV market. Besides channel 19 of Adams, MA (satellite station of ABC channel 10 from Albany),
it also has channel 51.