We have our share of bad actor LPFMs that give the service a bad reputation. LPFM is just that, a radio service. It is what people do with it that can make it or break it. Of course, the sneakyness of using these shill organizations and a hidden party in interest (in this case NTD/SOH/Epoch Times) is merely a way to circumvent the "one to a customer" rules that many of us fought for in the early days of LPFM. When LPFM was first created, the ownership cap was 10 stations and no localism requirement. The hope was that the FCC would have periodic windows, so the FCC limited the first window set (2000/2001) to one local applicant. But then came a few roadblocks such as the Radio Broadcast Preservation Act of 2000 and then the 2003 "anything goes" Great Translator Invasion (Auction 83), which eliminated many LPFM opportunities nationwide.
The problem is that there are many who advise me of valid cases of bad actors in LPFM and I agree that these certain stations are bad actors, but no one local is willing to go on record about it. Southern California and Houston are areas with a huge amount of LPFM abuse and Florida is an overall cancer. (Mind you, there are some good So. Cal LPFMs such as KBUU-LP, KWSV-LP, KXRN-LP, KQLH-LP (not NTD), KLDB-LP, KQBH-LP (which is also not NTD), KLIE-LP, etc.) Fortunately in Southern California, someone finally spoke up on the NTD/SOH applications there. In their opposition, NTD/SOH even admitted to what could be seen as a hidden party in interest.
During the LPFM window, I did deal directly with those who were truly behind these stations in time share negotiations and all I can say is shady as f. I did intervene early on in the case of former KQEK-LP, Cupertino CA and was labelled as "anti-Asian" by their attorney. Of course, I reminded them of the fact that for the past 20 years, I have been running Japanese programming on internet streams, which kind of disqualified their "when all else fails, reach for the race card" defense. (Dan Alpert labeled me as a "hater of Hispanic Christians" when I went after the Cesar Guel applications in 2013).
We have a complete document history about the KQEK-LP case at
https://recnet.com/kqek - so you can see how well funded these folks are and how far they will go. They have already taken two of their dismissals to the DC Circuit. Despite the shoddy performance of their stations, they do have the money when the need it.
I will say this though. Of the other NTD/SOH California renewals that were timely filed (KQEA-LP & KQEB-LP), despite being "clean" renewals (no reported silent, no NOVs, timely filed), they were never granted when the FCC did their bulk grant of the CA renewals last Monday. Also of note, KQPV-LP and KQWA-LP did not even file renewals. It looks like KQES-LP, Seattle was timely filed.
As far as whether LPFM stations must carry local programs. LPFM stations that won their construction permits through the comparative review process and used their points to achieve what they have are the only ones required to run 8 hours a day of local programming and have a main studio for 20 hours a week if they made those pledges. In the case of NTD/SOH, stations subject to such pledges include: KQEA-LP, KQEB-LP and KQSG-LP. The Seattle station is not subject to the pledge.