Flying-Dutchman said:Also, this have never been done. If you do this, you are in untested uncharted
water.
This ruling came as a surprise brought on by the current economy. Let's see
what develops.
Just as the NPR crowd was encouraged by Washington a few years ago to find new ways to finance their operations with less and less Federal money coming their way, they were encouraged to push a little harder in stretching what had been assumed about restrictions on how they could secure funding at the local level.
There seems to be a fresh breeze blowing in the Democrat controlled Congress to give the LPFMs a little more leeway than was assumed in the past. So far it is mostly talk and posturing by certain members of Congress. In a few months we will know if it is "The Real Deal" or just more Washington hot-air rather than a fresh breeze.
One area I would look for Washington to tighten down on rather than loosen up, is in the area of LPFM stations generating more programming that is authentic, home grown and organic. Why would an LPFM EVER rebroadcast on a regular basis something an AM station was doing. Maybe a once a week interview program with the mayor or something of that type, but hour after hour of playing repeater? That would be a betrayal of the entire announced intention of LPFM.
The concept that may KILL the whole LPFM movement is this illegitimate concept that you can receive by satellite hours and hours of programming created 2,000 miles away, and if you store it on your hard drive for an hour and they have your automation machine harvest the programming from the hard drive, it is then considered "locally produced programming". I try not to think about that concept too often. It's a real drag cleaning the carpet after I barf over that one.