WhoDat! said:as far as smoking on TV or anywhere else, we were a more FREE Country back then, and i know there are those who hate it and so forth, But remember 1st they came after cigarettes, and you were not a smoker, so you didn't care, Now there are idiots comming after large soft drinks and salt, who knows what's next! there will never be an end to politicians meddling in your life.. and it all started with cigarettes. Yet these same politicians don't mind raking in the Tax Money from smokers, and there is talk about taxing junk food and whatever is next, and whatever is next, might be something YOU enjoy, in a "Free" Country........ so you might want to think first before you applaud the banning or taxing of something, someone else enjoys and you don't, because You're Next.
This is an excellent, if unpopular, viewpoint. It is amazing to me how many young folks just think it is okay for gov't to ban large drinks, or sugar intake or generally decide what is, or is not, good for us. I remember in 1966 when the federal gov't required american auto manufacturers to include seat belts in their cars by 1968. I claimed it was great because it would give people a choice. An elderly gentleman I worked with said that within my lifetime gov't would REQUIRE folks to war seat belts. I laughed at him and told him he was a bitter old man. Within 15 yrs he was vindicated. What started out as a choice has become a requirement with large cask penalties if you don't comply. I find it amazing that some of the same states that ban smoking in any buildings want to legalize pot. Guess that kind of smoke doesn't affect the lungs, right