Talk_Dude said:
klutch00 said:
denio said:
(However here's the secret, people love the soft AC artist)
That is an excellent suggestion! As such, may I suggest that the new crop of soft ACs play some album and less common tracks by artists that the audience should find appealing. A few suggestions might include "Two Hot Girls" and "Better Not Tell Her" by Carly Simon; "Candle In The Wind", "Harmony", "Tiny Dancer", "Friends" and "Border Song" by Elton John; "Rosalinda's Eyes", "You're My Home" and "The Stranger (Reprise)" by Billy Joel; "Poems, Prayers and Promises", "Follow Me", "Wild Montana Skies", "I Guess He'd Rather Be In Colorado" and "Some Days Are Diamonds" by John Denver; just for starters!
There is a problem with that excellent idea. According to the experts in programming radio stations, only the people who listen to CHR like to hear new songs on the radio. Everyone else only likes to hear songs they already know.
And the songs which I mentioned DO have some viability! They may be songs that didn't perform well on the Pop charts back in the day, but they have some respect today. Plus, they're by artists that people will recognize and relate to!
Something seems to happen to the brains of people when they reach the age when they switch from Top 40/CHR to any vintage format. All of a sudden, the part of their brain that really enjoys hearing a new song that sounds like other songs that they like explodes. For the rest of their lives, they only want to hear the songs that were certified "hits" when they were younger.
I don't know where the hell you are getting your information! I sure as hell never felt that way! If I could relate to a given sound, I'd give that artist or song 'a chance'. There were many songs that got 'lost' for no real good reason!
You only have to read the posts in Radio-Info.com made by the experts to know that what I've said is true. All of those great sounding song you listed that anyone with a lick of common sense would agree would be perfect for a "Soft AC & Standards" format are unacceptable, because when listeners hear them and don't recognize them as well known and beloved hits from yesteryear, they are psychically compelled to change the radio station.
I think most of the 'experts' don't know their rear ends form a hole in the ground much of the time! They seem to 'walk on eggshells' and don't program enough with their guts! Maybe this is corporate mentality at work.
About being 'psychically compelled to change the station'? The artists which I mentioned above have broad appeal and I don't think too many people would find the aforementioned titles to be objectionable. Keep in mind that the target audience for that format is now 45+ or maybe even 35+. Many of those people in that age range (particularly those under 55 or 60) were fans or became fans of the aforementioned artists and own albums by them. I know that you can't go too deep on an album or you
will scare some listeners away, but most of the tracks which I mentioned should be considered 'safe', even for a soft AC for today.