I was wondering if there is a physical distance problem when using Barix boxes as STL's. For example could you have a studio in NYC feed an FM transmitter in Texas using a Barix box setup without any issues?
Adding to what Steve said; Barix boxes are inexpensive ways of sending decent quality audio via the public Internet, but sometimes you get what you pay for. Barix devices have been known to be easily hacked, which could result in someone hijacking whatever station you're feeding with a Barix STL. There are much more reliable and secure devices from manufacturers like Comrex and Tieline.I was wondering if there is a physical distance problem when using Barix boxes as STL's. For example could you have a studio in NYC feed an FM transmitter in Texas using a Barix box setup without any issues?
Basically I run the buffer as high as possible around 900+ . Set to 48khz . VBR. I was lucky enough to be able to hear the station I was setting up from the sending end and tried stuff like running lower khz thinking less data would need to get through. It burped every 20 seconds or so. and of course the audio bandwidth was low. I then set it for high data and I came to the conclusion that if I ran high data i.e. 48khz if some of the data didn't get through it wouldn't matter there was still plenty there. The burps decreased to about one about every 10 minutes. Then I tried sending the stream point to point from the studio address directly to the transmitter address. After pinging the route I noted it ran from Florida to Kansas City then to New York and finally back to the transmitter site only 5 miles from the studio. I assumed the longer the route the more chance of failure but found that if I ran the stream to a server and then to the receive site through the server reliability was increased to 99%. The server I use is in NYC a long way from Florida. I first test was over a very weak system. While the sending end was through cable the only system available at the transmitter was DSL 7,000 feet from the B Box and the best rate we got was 7,000 . I have used these settings from several other sites and found this to work quite well. Hope that helps.
You make a good point I found that setting it to Variable Bit rate on the Barix was the only way it would remain stabile.If you're trying to reduce bandwith on a slow/shaky connection, the audio sample rate/bit depth won't help much..48khz/44khz wont make much difference. you need to change the bitrate..... say 128 instead of 256kbps.
We were trying that when i worked at another alaska station but lowering the bitrate, even when adjusting treble and bass made the station sound kinda grungy
DSL should work ok for a brix box if youre download is 7mbs, as long as youre upload is 1meg. I had DSL at a station in California that used IP as an STL..
If youre on a shaky connection with slow speeds, a Comrex briclink is a better option.. i wish theyd thought of that here.
I don't do satellite internet. Throwing bits at the earth from space will never catch on.
Never had to use it but Elon Musk's satellite service seems to have good bandwidth. Just ask the Russian Navy