Sure David, let's say you're probably right on all accounts. That's the mindset when it comes to the narrowminded thinking of today's commercial radio companies that made me leave terrestrial radio for podcasting 16 years ago. As long as they can manipulate the small samples of actual listeners provided through Nielsen PPMs to siphon advertising dollars...but at the listener's expense and abandonment for streaming.
You could boast each local station's annual billing. They've been running a ridiculous amount of ads to make good on any advertiser's PPM expectations.
What do they care about?
At the latest Hispanic Radio Conference, SBS COO Albert Rodriguez was quoted to have said "having too many commercials isn’t a bad thing." Univision Radio President Jesus Lara spoke of having “a couple of volume deals” with a couple of third-party players. Doesn't sound like the programming has any priority, nor does the listener base but hey look at all that billing.
Question is for how long? There will come a day that terrestrial radio will lose its battle for listeners for programming and cannot sustain targeting an aging demographic and a continued decline in billing and then what do you say to those cherished advertisers? I'd rather talk about long-term solutions then brag about being oversold.
Ignorance of the remaining audience (or any future adopters) will be the ultimate downfall of this medium until radio decides to actually tackle the digital disruption and learn how to program for the next generation of listeners and monetize them.
What's so wrong about thinking of up some new formats for a change and seek out some new listeners that know there is a radio on their car dashboard for a reason? Maybe they'll actually find something for them to check out on FM or AM that will be more than just tired programming and too many ads?
As always! Have the last word, David. I'm sure you'll say I don't know what I'm talking about like you tell everyone else.