The irony here, is the people accusing chunky of "probably sending a text like that", miss the point , this "14 year old" admits in their own posts, on their own site, that THEY came up with that "insulting post first" and that it was returned word for word back to the "14 year old." Based on the 14 year olds own statements we can only conclude that the "14 year old" is the one that talks like that.
Please people, that post stuff like, "well 92.3 probably posted because they got a nasty text first", please, please, read this persons comments page, it says that it was the "14 year old's" own text message that was "so rudely texted back" in its "exact" form. So no matter how mature or not Chunky may be, or if he was even there at that time, the "14 year old" already admitted complete ownership of those words on the youtube page.
And how many 14 year olds.... that talk with that sort of language, pay so much attention, that they watch all those media outlets, and Fox News, and even try to get Perez Hilton. This really sounds like attention getting setup, but Im amazed at the people commenting that obviosly didnt read any of the this "14 year old's" comments on the page; that just throw baseless judgments out there. Reading is always the key, and usually leads you to the answer.
(Perhaps I'm overly sensitive, I was a Journalism major, so i just take details very very seriously)