A
Anonymouse
Guest
I noticed it was deleted by an admin.
There's another 94.1 thread about an LPFM near San Marcos.
So to clarify this thread was regarding KTFM in San Antonio and it's possible flip to an alternative or EDM format.
The original thread was deleted because it contained copyrighted material from Radioinsight. I was ordered by Radioinsight to take it down.
I had no idea Lance ran this board too.
I think the message here is that the OP used copyrighted material and the owner asked it to be removed.
David E commented that there was chatter about 103.1 The App rebranding to 103.1 The Amp.
You mean 103.3?
Thanks, Frank. I thought that might be the case just had to check. From my understanding the original thread started out with an exact quote from material for RadioInsight premium subscribers only that was taken down after Lance called for it's removal. What happened to an open Internet with the ability to freely share information? Also I agree with Purple and think Lance is selling the information. I guess one can paraphrase the article and get out of RadioInsight's wrath, but it won't be me since I don't have RadioInsight Premium.
I didn't see the original topic, David, so I'm a little in the dark here. Did someone post material that came from behind Lance's paywall? If so, the person that accessed the material, through payment of the nominal fee to Lance, would then "own" the material, not RadioInsight since the published material was made available to the public via payment to Lance for the services he is rendering.
Paying to read Lance's material does not convey the right for one to allow others to read it for free. Think of buying a copy of Office; you pay for your usage but you can't make copies for your friends and develop a hack for the registration code. Or, closer to home, you may pay a couple of hundred dollars for Inside Radio. You can't take the publication and distribute it to all your friends as what you bought was a single use license.
Purple as I said earlier you probably can paraphrase the article and be fine. My understanding is that paraphrasing is okay, since it's different wording.
I disagree. I have a subscription to the Houston Chronicle. When I'm done with the paper, and someone wants it afterwards, I'm willing to hand it over to my neighbor, family member, etc. I paid for it, so it's mine to do with what I wish. Lance no longer "owns" the material once he released the information to the public for consumption.
But your copy is still a single copy. It is not reproduced into thousands of other copies and sold or distributed.
Lance no longer "owns" the material once he released the information to the public for consumption.