• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

American digital radio a half a##ed system: John Anderson at #CBAA13

Looks like John Anderson of Brooklyn College is not a big fan of IBOC radio, here are a few quotes from the piece in Radioinfo from the CBAA13 conference: (I wonder where they got the name Radioinfo?)

Speaking at today’s CBAA Conference, Dr John Anderson, Director of Broadcast Journalism at America’s Brooklyn College, told the conference that America’s HD digital radio system “kinda works.”

Anderson believes that the American closed system model “stifles innovation and causes pain for small broadcasters who can’t afford it.. It is a half assed home grown digital radio technology.”

“Digital radio… it could be worse. America is an example of how not to do it.”*

* not sure if that is his quote or the writer's.

More @ http://www.radioinfo.com.au/news/american-digital-radio-half-assed-system-john-anderson-cbaa13
 
Yeah, hi, that's me! I just finished a book about this, to come out next month, which is what I was speaking on down under. (Infuriatingly obscenely overpriced, but I think I'll make the e-version available on my site. Have your local library order it...and there is a good chance that a follow-up paperback run will happen next yr.)

While I'm not an HD fan, I'm not the hater that this particular article plays me out to be. The book itself is more a story about the failure of policymaking that allowed our digital transition to get munged up so badly than it is some anti-HD screed. In fact, I'll be attending the NAB Show in April to meet with an interesting collection of folks to see if there are some points of common ground from which we might try to change the current trajectory of malaise. The first step toward tackling a problem is admitting you have one, after all.
 
I've been reading DIYmedia.net almost from its beginning and, of course, Dr. John has been following and reporting on HD Radio since its inception. Always great reading.

I'm still amazed after all these years how little traction HD Radio has gained in home entertainment. I was reading the latest Radio World and in the article, "Gift-Ready Radios for Holiday Season" it lists seven portable and home radios, including the pricey Grace Digital Tuner, that would make great gifts. None of them have HD Radio. What several of them do have is an internet connection.

Maybe HD Radio is doing well in the car but it's MIA in the home and I'm a little surprised that RW would list these radios without mentioning at least one with HD Radio. Of course, there may not be any to mention.
 
Last edited:
Maybe HD Radio is doing well in the car but it's MIA in the home and I'm a little surprised that RW would list these radios without mentioning at least one with HD Radio. Of course, there may not be any to mention.

How is HD Radio "doing well in the car?" I rent a lot of cars, and none of them have HD. Most have Sirius.

This article completely ignores the fact that Sirius and streaming radio are both digital systems. How can this professor lecture on digital radio and ignore them?
 
Last edited:
How is HD Radio "doing well in the car?" I rent a lot of cars, and none of them have HD. Most have Sirius.

This article completely ignores the fact that Sirius and streaming radio are both digital systems. How can this professor lecture on digital radio and ignore them?

Not only do most cars not have HD, in many radios which do receive HD, it takes extra steps to hear the HD channels. I've had two cars with HD. On the first one, I was finally able to figure out how to turn HD off, as it suffered from so many dropouts as to be annoying. In the second car with HD, now about 4 years old, the radio requires some setting to find HD on FM. I never bothered to figure that out, so don't listen to any HD or HD-2 on FM.

But not only do most car radios not have HD... or difficult to use HD features if they have the "feature"... but what everyone from iBiquity on down the HD food chain ignores is that two-thirds of radio listening is not in the car anyway.
 
Anderson believes that the American closed system model “stifles innovation and causes pain for small broadcasters who can’t afford it.. It is a half assed home grown digital radio technology.”

My view is that necessity is the mother of invention. If there was a real need for what this particular invention does, lots of people would be inventing alternative ways to do the same thing. But this has been such an outright failure that no inventor or electronics manufacturer really wants to invest any time or money trying to cram something into an already-overcrowded spectrum. Innovation isn't stifled. It's just there's no motivation to drive down the same dead end.

Also I really wouldn't called HD radio the "American" system. It's the iBiquity system. That's it. They invented it, and own the copyright on it. No different than any other copyright.
 
Last edited:
How is HD Radio "doing well in the car?" I rent a lot of cars, and none of them have HD. Most have Sirius.

This article completely ignores the fact that Sirius and streaming radio are both digital systems. How can this professor lecture on digital radio and ignore them?

Actually I address all of that in the book. Read the publisher's blurb and you will see your concerns are quite prevalent. In fact, the impetus for HD came from an incoherent fear that digital satellite radio would eat terrestrial radio's lunch. Not true, of course..but very prevalent in HD's early days, for sure.

Like I said, the Australian trade pub article kind of superficializes things. If you're in the NYC area, I'll gladly buy you a beer (or three) and we can suss all this out. Same offer applies to iyiyi!
 
My view is that necessity is the mother of invention. If there was a real need for what this particular invention does, lots of people would be inventing alternative ways to do the same thing. But this has been such an outright failure that no inventor or electronics manufacturer really wants to invest any time or money trying to cram something into an already-overcrowded spectrum. Innovation isn't stifled. It's just there's no motivation to drive down the same dead end.

Also I really wouldn't called HD radio the "American" system. It's the iBiquity system. That's it. They invented it, and own the copyright on it. No different than any other copyright.

Good post, exactly BigA, if there was a need or a want for it, it would have taken off after all this time and we all know it hasn't despite ibiquity trying every which way to gain traction for this science fair project which never should have left the 8th grade lab it was born in.
 
Actually I address all of that in the book. Read the publisher's blurb and you will see your concerns are quite prevalent. In fact, the impetus for HD came from an incoherent fear that digital satellite radio would eat terrestrial radio's lunch. Not true, of course..but very prevalent in HD's early days, for sure.

It all sounds like ancient history. We've all moved on to streaming, which negates the need for cramming digital in the broadcast spectrum.

The American "system" if you can call it that is very diverse. The real killer to digital radio is music royalties. That's the real story.
 
How is HD Radio "doing well in the car?" I rent a lot of cars, and none of them have HD. Most have Sirius.

This article completely ignores the fact that Sirius and streaming radio are both digital systems. How can this professor lecture on digital radio and ignore them?

To hear iBiquity tell it, they're practically signing up a new carmaker every day:

http://www.ibiquity.com/press_room/news_releases/2013/1621

And I use the expression "doing well in the car" only in a relative sense, that is, compared to how HD Radio is doing in the home entertainment market which is nada.

Oh, and for all you VHF channels 5&6 hopefuls out there, forget it. The FCC is trying to designate the entire broadcast TV band, and that includes VHF, open for wireless mobile communications.
 
Oh, and for all you VHF channels 5&6 hopefuls out there, forget it. The FCC is trying to designate the entire broadcast TV band, and that includes VHF, open for wireless mobile communications.

Of course! That's where the real explosion has been. That's why broadcasters have opted for streaming.

If you believe press releases, read the one from the FCC on how they're going to save AM. What a load of malarkey.
 


Not only do most cars not have HD, in many radios which do receive HD, it takes extra steps to hear the HD channels. I've had two cars with HD. On the first one, I was finally able to figure out how to turn HD off, as it suffered from so many dropouts as to be annoying. In the second car with HD, now about 4 years old, the radio requires some setting to find HD on FM. I never bothered to figure that out, so don't listen to any HD or HD-2 on FM.

But not only do most car radios not have HD... or difficult to use HD features if they have the "feature"... but what everyone from iBiquity on down the HD food chain ignores is that two-thirds of radio listening is not in the car anyway.

I'm probably the exact opposite - the ONLY over the air listening I do in the car is HD-2, because Houston's creative formats are almost all on HD-2. So in spite of being a vocal critic of the technology, I am forced into using it to get formats like oldies, smooth jazz, and Christian rock. Of course I use satellite and streaming as well, but the audio quality is better on HD-2's. HD-3 is a different matter, it is noticeably worse.

We are talking the average consumer - the ones that couldn't program the clocks on VCR's 20 years ago. IF HD FM is working - and that is a big IF considering the myriad of technical issues, the ad campaign about "the stations between the stations" makes some sense, because the consumer can merely hit the "scan" or "tune up/down" button and sure enough the HD-2 appears to be between adjacent frequencies. But the use of "tune up / down" is probably rare compared with "scan", so the HD signal better be there or the radio proceeds to the next strong local.

I find the FM system robust enough in my car - 70 mile HD reception is adequate for a metro area. But that is in the car with the best DX car radio on the market with a real whip antenna. I am concerned that average car radios will get considerably less range, the average home probably has a lot of attenuation in these days of radiant barriers, HOA's forbid outdoor antennas for the small minority of consumers willing to use one. Office buildings have even more attenuation, so you are left with a system that has very limited range. 10 dB increase is paltry and insufficient to solve the problems, especially under airport approach / departure patterns. NOBODY at Ibiquity thought through the IF image problem, and that causes most HD FM dropouts in my car. I could give you the ratings for some Houston stations just based on how many times a nearby car or home receiver jams my HD reception. All the sudden that 10.6 to 10.8 MHz spacing rule is meaningless, because even non-HD radios are pumping out IF images from 10.4 to 11 MHz, making a whole lot more combinations of frequencies that don't play well together. Obviously experienced DX'ers are going to put up with the problems, radio engineers will know what is going on and know the signal will come back, and people like me who are forced to HD-2 to get the formats we want have to put up with the problems. But the average consumer? The moment there is a dropout, the are GONE from the station, on their iPods or Pandora or other over the air - and probably won't give HD another chance. I hear some of that in your post. Unfortunately for radio - HD TV came first with an expectation of "perfect, relaible picture". When HD radio failed in the reliability department, and wasn't really that much of an improvement over the audio quality of a good analog signal chain - most consumers got apathetic. Ibiquity didn't do themselves any favors by hawking trendy table radios - you won't hear the difference. They should have gone straight to the audiophiles - the ones that are left, and the home theater enthusiasts who have sound systems that can really reproduce the music adequately. But - who is going to sit in a home theater room staring at a blank screen, and listen to music? Except for HD-2, HD FM didn't really bring anything compelling to the game, so consumers yawned.

I'm probably preaching to the choir here, but if iBiquity is to have any chance at all, they need to analyze where the listeners are and adapt the system to better suit those listeners. Of course this is 11:59 PM on the day HD died, so it is probably too late to re-capture the consumer market. There will be a lot of HD radios out there with nobody listening to HD, then stations not broadcasting it, then car manufacturers stripping the decode circuitry out. Just try to be a C-Quam car radio today --- that will be HD radio in 20 years or less.
 
My car has a Lexicon system which has both HD and Sirius. Both offer the content I like but HD is leagues better fidelity than Sirius, not to mention that the HD station is commercial-free and subscription-free. So, the only thing I listen to in my car is HD and I hope it never goes away. In my geography I don't seem to have the drop-outs and other issues a lot of other users have. It is as reliable as analog FM and no more difficult to tune.

I don't listen to HD at home because I don't listen to OTA radio at home. In fact, I rarely listen to any type of radio at home any longer. I am either watching OTA TV or some sort of video via the Internet.
 
My car has a Lexicon system which has both HD and Sirius. Both offer the content I like but HD is leagues better fidelity than Sirius, not to mention that the HD station is commercial-free and subscription-free. So, the only thing I listen to in my car is HD and I hope it never goes away. In my geography I don't seem to have the drop-outs and other issues a lot of other users have. It is as reliable as analog FM and no more difficult to tune.


I don't know because I have XM rather than Sirius for the music but I think you have to admit that Sat-Rad offers a LOT more choice of channels and formats than HD and you can drive across the country and listen to the same station if you like.
 
And although my car(s) have HD radio in them, I am in an area where it is tough enough to get FM, much less HD. So XM is my only answer.
 
It all sounds like ancient history. We've all moved on to streaming, which negates the need for cramming digital in the broadcast spectrum.

The American "system" if you can call it that is very diverse. The real killer to digital radio is music royalties. That's the real story.

Well, in some ways, it *is* ancient history. I just chronicled it. And not everyone's moved onto streaming; what, about 60% of all stations currently stream now?

And like it or not, HD *is* the "American" system. Born here, developed here, adopted here (and hardly anywhere else).

Which one are you: Waldorf or Statler?
 
Well, in some ways, it *is* ancient history. I just chronicled it. And not everyone's moved onto streaming; what, about 60% of all stations currently stream now?

And what percentage have an HD 2?

As I said, the industry has moved on. You chronicled a small side trip on the long road of radio. One which most stations didn't take. And 99% of the consumers don't even know about.
 
Last edited:
I don't know because I have XM rather than Sirius for the music but I think you have to admit that Sat-Rad offers a LOT more choice of channels and formats than HD and you can drive across the country and listen to the same station if you like.

My radio will tune XM as well and as far as the number of formats, yes, far more on satt radio than HD. If I was a long-distance trucker satt radio would be my choice but because I do not care for all the many formats (I listen to one format only) and don't travel out of town all that much and the fidelity is so much better on HD as compared to satt radio AND it is subscription-free - all reasons why HD works for me.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.
Back
Top Bottom