• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WJIB may debut // 101.3 Fri



It's an illegal station. It should be an embarrassment for the church, particularly if they can be seen as aiding in the illegal activities.

Probably....but still bad PR and TV images. (mostly white males fed(?) agents raiding a black church building...carrying out boxes, files, etc.)

Many churches and politicians are not worried about embarrassment these days. ;-)

Also, for an alienated community that see the AG, local police, and the Fed Govt operating against them, this could add fuel to that position.

You can see the conspiracy theories abound...."The are only targeting this stations because it serves the Black and Caribbean people of Boston!"
 
Last edited:


You are assuming the pirate is being run as a legitimate business. Most pirates don't have a license, don't have city permits, don't pay taxes and ignore other rules and regulations of our society.
I am assuming none of those things.
I am looking at going after the church for aiding this pirate.
All I am assuming is the church that is allowing this pirate to keep his broadcasting stuff on the church property can be hit hard with fines, maybe if they are getting FedGov money for any youth programs that should be cut and stuff like that.

Has a legitimate broadcaster ever been hindered from broadcasting for so long by a pirate before ?
We are going on 5 days and counting now.
 
Maybe the FCC should just turn a blind eye toward 87.7 MHz. The pirates could fight each other there. It could be a problem for WMBR, though.
 
Probably....but still bad PR and TV images. (mostly white males fed(?) agents raiding a black church building...carrying out boxes, files, etc.)

Many churches and politicians are not worried about embarrassment these days. ;-)

Also, for an alienated community that see the AG, local police, and the Fed Govt operating against them, this could add fuel to that position.

You can see the conspiracy theories abound...."The are only targeting this stations because it serves the Black and Caribbean people of Boston!"

And licensed, legitimate Boston radio has done abominably in serving that community since WILD was leased to the Chinese. WJMN plays hip-hop and some R&B, but nothing from the Caribbean and, as just another anonymous cog in the iHeart machine, only pays the slightest of lip service to the city and minority it is targeting. You can see why the late Mayor Menino gave his tacit approval to The Touch (Clemmons's pirate) by taking part in its campaign coverage a few years back. Either he didn't know Touch was breaking the law or figured that if it was providing such a great service to a Boston community legit broadcasters are underserving, the legality of the operation was irrelevant. Could the FCC be thinking along Mumbles' lines?
 


You are assuming the pirate is being run as a legitimate business. Most pirates don't have a license, don't have city permits, don't pay taxes and ignore other rules and regulations of our society.

Boston's unique (that's a mild word for it) history of race relations makes this situation more complex than it is elsewhere. I'm a native, and there was this New Yorker on my dorm floor in college (in upstate NY) who always used to ask me how things were in "Birmingham North." This was in the '70s, around the time of the forced busing protests. There are black athletes who still won't even consider Boston as a trade or free-agency destination. It's gotten better, and I don't think it was ever "Birmingham North"-bad, but the old reputation is hard to shake, which is why a slick operation serving the community that does everything professionally except get a license and pay taxes won't be easy to displace. The fact that Bob Bittner's licensed station has a format that won't attract more than a few African-American or Caribbean listeners -- all over 65 and fans of Nat King Cole and Harry Belafonte -- doesn't help.
 
Last edited:
And licensed, legitimate Boston radio has done abominably in serving that community since WILD was leased to the Chinese. WJMN plays hip-hop and some R&B, but nothing from the Caribbean and, as just another anonymous cog in the iHeart machine, only pays the slightest of lip service to the city and minority it is targeting.

The problem is that the market segment was not profitable for a "pure" format... the existing FMs that appeal to African Americans are coalition stations that also appeal to Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites.

As to the Caribbean, there is not a pure consensus, as the constituency is very different... Trinidadians are not of identical musical tastes as Jamaicans, and neither is the same when compared to Belizeans. There is no real consensus, despite the similarities. Again, a market that can not be served by commercial FM... but a good opportunity for a non-commercial one to do something useful (with funding being a real issue).
 
Probably....but still bad PR and TV images. (mostly white males fed(?) agents raiding a black church building...carrying out boxes, files, etc.)

FCC enforcement visits don't involve "agents" and the carrying of anything. An FCC employee presents what is the equivalent of a cease and desist order, with wording about fines to be assessed.

In places like Florida, the state has laws against unlicensed broadcasting and they can go much further than the FCC can. The lack of enforcement power by the FCC is a major reason why pirates exist.

It won't be until a pirate causes an aviation accident or interrupts emergency services that they will be vehemently pursued... but the risk is very real as someone who was on a violently aborted landing at MIA caused by interference with tower communications by a pirate can attest.
 


FCC enforcement visits don't involve "agents" and the carrying of anything.

When "Touch 106.1" was finally shut down, there were indeed federal marshals "carrying things".

You can see it in this story from the Boston Globe. (They are the ones with the jackets that say "Federal Marshal" on them.....the ones "carrying things!") ;-)

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...n-community/FwUAmBjkW314GNH9nJ7RlO/story.html



An FCC employee presents what is the equivalent of a cease and desist order, with wording about fines to be assessed.

Since they have have ignored every communication and intent of every violation notice, I don't think an equivalent of a cease and desist order would do much.

Many pirates after a visit from the FCC have fired up again as soon as the FCC Field "Agent" leaves...sometimes in different location.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/05/n...caribbean-no-less-are-pulled-off-the-air.html

"“As quick as they can shut them back down, they pop back up in a different building,” Mr. Finkelberg said. “I hope not, but I would not be surprised if they were back on Monday somewhere.”"

What's needed is for the equipment to be confiscated....antenna, computers, transmitter.....to stop them from moving to a different location.
 
Last edited:




It won't be until a pirate causes an aviation accident or interrupts emergency services that they will be vehemently pursued...


There was a pirate in IIRC Brockton that was screwing with one of the BOS ground frequencies, they moved pretty effn fast that day let me tell you .... https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...logan/&usg=AFQjCNEi2vzUeQuFnBd0dsO5E7qmgg6bYw




https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...y.html&usg=AFQjCNEwbmmOt15E8xa-F60sLS7V04YAZg


this one screwed with public safety/fire dept radios http://www.enterprisenews.com/article/20130817/News/308179862
 
When "Touch 106.1" was finally shut down, there were indeed federal marshals "carrying things".

But those are not FCC officials. The case had gone beyond the FCC jurisdiction and involved public safety issues.

Since they have have ignored every communication and intent of every violation notice, I don't think an equivalent of a cease and desist order would do much.

It never has. That is why either state law, when such exists, or other agencies have to shut a station down. It's sad that they continue to operate because they are truly dangerous in many ways.
 
There was a pirate in IIRC Brockton that was screwing with one of the BOS ground frequencies, they moved pretty effn fast that day let me tell you

I am told that is what happened after the flight I was on from LAX to MIA was violently diverted from landing due to a Kreyol language station broadcasting to the Haitian community somewhat close to the airport. I checked with our chief engineer at the HBC cluster and he found out that the airport had contacted "other" authorities and they closed the station and arrested the staff for endangerment of an aircraft and public safety issues.
 
The pastor of the church that owns that building (616 Blue Hill Ave) where a few pirate antennae are on top of, has (or had) a preaching-teaching program Sundays 9-10 AM on one of the pirate stations, 87.7.
 


But those are not FCC officials. The case had gone beyond the FCC jurisdiction and involved public safety issues.

No they aren't. But when the FCC needs to physically shut someone down, this is how it's done....and those are the pictures that end up ion the newspaper.

What "public safety issues" were involved with the shutdown of Touch 106.1?
 
What "public safety issues" were involved with the shutdown of Touch 106.1?

They had same issues as with all pirates that don't have type accepted equipment and, generally, using stuff they buy off the Internet that is cheap and crappy: they potentially interfere with the adjacent aircraft and emergency frequencies and endanger public safety. Since they don't have technical standards to adhere to (as they don't abide by FCC licensing anyway) the transmitters often have mixing products, harmonics, spurious radiation and all kinds of other technical illnesses.
 
Bob Bitner has sent the following to supporters bt email

WJIB, AM-740 in Cambridge has legally applied for and received a Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) grant to broadcast the same AM signal on FM radio at 101.3. And it began on August 4,
2017 from atop WJIB’s AM radio tower on Concord Avenue, Cambridge. However, an estimated 70% of
people in WJIB’s FM coverage area will not be able to hear WJIB’s FM station due to the fact that there is a
station calling itself “Big City Radio”, operating very illegally on the same 101.3 frequency from a churchowned
building on Blue Hill Avenue in Dorchester, across from Franklin Park, a building from which several
pirate stations have transmitted from. More on pirates below, but now let’s look at…

Cities and towns where WJIB should be able to be heard on FM 101.3: (without pirate interference):
Boston, Cambridge, Waltham, Newton, Belmont, Watertown, Medford, Somerville, Chelsea, Revere, Everett,
Winthrop, Revere, Melrose, Saugus, Lynn, Nahant, Swampscott, Peabody, Salem, Brookline, Milton, Dedham,
Quincy, Weymouth, Hingham, Hull.

Cities and towns where reception will be spotty, depending upon where you are: Weston, Wellesley,
Needham, Westwood, Canton, Randolph, Cohasset, Lincoln, Arlington, Lexington, Woburn, Winchester,
Wakefield, Reading, Wilmington, Billerica, Reading, Danvers, Lynnfield, Marblehead, Beverly. WJIB’s FM
signal is “directional” meaning that it doesn’t go the same distance in all directions. It is suppressed to the
North-NorthWest, and to the SouthWest to a lesser extent, in order to protect other stations who were there first.

So, who is supposed to shut down illegal pirate stations? It’s the FCC. And they have successfully done
so to many of these stations across the country. But in the past two decades, it has become harder and harder to
do because of the ever-increasing number of pirates. In New York City, there are over 100 known pirates. In
Miami, almost as many. And in eastern Mass, from Lowell-Lawrence-Haverhill, thru Boston and to Brockton,
there are 20 to 30. Two of these are operating at quite high power, higher than such authorized for WJIB’s FM
station. And one of them (Big City) is right on WJIB’s dial location, 101.3. The other is on 87.7.

On July 13, 2017, the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau sent a letter to the female morning host on Big City
informing her that the station she was on is an illegal operation violating federal laws, and that continued
operation of it could result in equipment confiscation, substantial fines and imprisonment. Shortly afterwards,
she announced on air that “this is my last show” and then fled the station. The letter also demanded that “the
operation of this radio station must be discontinued immediately”. The ownership of Big City has been known
to be defiant of FCC laws, and continues to operate; apparently believing that the FCC will do nothing further.
An FCC agent measured the strength of the Big City pirate signal and found it to be about one thousand-times
stronger than allowed by law. (FCC laws DO say that one can broadcast at the equivalent of 1/10th of one watt
without a license; a power level that would send a signal to just one or two city blocks.)

Meanwhile, the FCC in Washington, DC has been acknowledging this nationwide pirate problem, and
vows to be much more aggressive in shutting them down, and using all laws at their disposal. This situation is
getting very high priority right now, likely due to legitimate broadcasters in a joint organized effort to bring this
problem to the FCC, and also pirate broadcasters, having been known to use inappropriate transmitters and
wiring, which can interfere also with airplane-to-control-tower communications, and local emergency
communications. Pirate broadcasters are also known to not pay any music licensing fees to ASCAP, BMI, etc,
nor pay FCC Regulatory Fees, and to not have Emergency Alert System equipment to alert its listeners of any
national or local emergency situations. (all of which are also violations of federal laws).

Pirate broadcasters are almost always minority groups, and most of them loudly say that radio does not
represent the minority communities well. In many cities, that is true, or partially true. Boston is included here,
as African-American radio has a recent irregular record. Boston lost a great African-American owned station a
decade ago, with the demise of AM 1090, WILD. The licensee of the 1090 AM channel has been renting it to,
and now is selling it to a west coast group, who programs full-time news and information from the Chinese
government, mostly in English. This left open inspiration of local Boston pirates. This year, however, there’s
WZBR at 1410 on the AM dial which is almost entirely African-American programming, broadcasting from the
Milton-Boston line. Additionally last year, the FCC allowed applications from non-profit organizations for new
low-powered FM stations nationwide. Several applications were submitted in the Boston area for the scare
space left on the FM dial. One was an African-American religious group that legally obtained 102.9, along with
the youth-teaching group “Zumix” in East Boston which also was awarded 102.9, in a shared station situation.
The folks at “Big City” could have applied for a dial-location too, by forming a non-profit organization
fostering African-American heritage and music preservation, but instead they chose the easier route, the illegal
route.

Pirate Radio is the crabgrass in the lawn on radio, and structure of the airwaves must be maintained.

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO HELP SPEED THE ENFORCEMENT PROCESS ALONG, please fill out
a Consumer Complaint Form at the FCC’s website.

1) – Go to fcc.gov
2) –click on “for Consumers” in the top right area.
3) –click on “Consumer Complaint Center”
4) –click on “Radio”
5) –then fill out the form. Tell them that “Big City 101.3” is greatly interfering with WJIB’s
“W267CE” (the official callsign of WJIB’s FM station).
6) –within that form is a drop-down menu where you are to click on “Pirates/Unauthorized Operations”
 
Could the FCC be thinking along Mumbles' lines?...

... which is why a slick operation serving the community that does everything professionally except get a license and pay taxes won't be easy to displace. The fact that Bob Bittner's licensed station has a format that won't attract more than a few African-American or Caribbean listeners -- all over 65 and fans of Nat King Cole and Harry Belafonte -- doesn't help.

None of that is relevant to the current situation. It might be a semi-valid argument in favor of a pirate causing no interference, such as the one on 87.7. However, even though 101.3 was once unused, it is now occupied by a licensed station, and the pirate is not just broadcasting without a license, but is willfully and maliciously interfering with that station. If the FCC doesn't find a way, with assistance from other agencies if needed, to get them off the air ASAP, then they are setting a bad precedent which could easily lead to pirates putting their signals on top of other locally licensed stations.
 
Yeah, 87.7 is the de facto urban station in the market. Despite being illegal, I feel like it is a nice way to fill the niche for listeners who want a legit urban station and not a heavily urban leaning rhythmic. There's no way any station can interfere with it!
 
Yeah, 87.7 is the de facto urban station in the market. Despite being illegal, I feel like it is a nice way to fill the niche for listeners who want a legit urban station and not a heavily urban leaning rhythmic.

There's no way any station can interfere with it!

Unless, of course, another pirate decides to set up a station on the same frequency....or on 87.9.

After all, why not? There are no rules.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.
Back
Top Bottom