It was WTMX, They did it for a month..I was listening to it
Now that EMF is taking over 100.3FM Los Angeles from Entercom. Who would Entercom Remove in San Francisco and Sacramento these are two major markets where Entercom has been specifically named for being over the ownership limit.
KGMZ may get poor ratings, but I understand it bills pretty well. Plus, Entercom uses it for its play-by-play rights. I doubt it’s going anywhere.
I'd have to guess KUFX 98.5, KITS 105.3 and KFRC 106.9 will be divested.
KGMZ may get poor ratings, but I understand it bills pretty well. Plus, Entercom uses it for its play-by-play rights. I doubt it’s going anywhere.
I'd have to guess KUFX 98.5, KITS 105.3 and KFRC 106.9 will be divested. Not sure about what else would go. I also doubt EMF is buying anything more from Entercom. Not that it couldn’t happen, but you would’ve expected to see any other EMF purchases on Tuesday's press release. San Francisco shouldn’t have any revenue issues. So, the DOJ shouldn’t have had any problems with Entercom divesting a property or two to EMF.
Sacramento will be another issue entirely. As I've mentioned in another thread or two, when operators divest to non-competitors, their shares of the revenue tend to go up due to the removal of a competitor in the advertising market. Anybody anywhere near 40% of the total market revenue isn’t likely to be allowed to divest to somebody who won’t participate in the commercial market. While I suppose a Trump DOJ might have a different philosophy, past DOJ's have indicated there isn't really a Democratic or Republican way of looking at that.
You really think KCBS is going to blow up its simulcast?
You really think KCBS is going to blow up its simulcast?
Seems more logical than getting rid of another profitable property, though it is one of the better signals in both clusters. Maybe things have changed in San Francisco since the simulcast began, but being on AM didn’t used to be the liability there that it was most other places. FM tended to have more signal issues than AM due to terrain, and AM still billed well.
That changed about 35 years ago, with KGO, KCBS and KNBR being the exception in billing.
My understanding is that more than half of KCBS' audience listens on FM, and it's been on 106.9 for nine years now. A frequency change would be risky. Ending the simulcast would be suicide.
Seems more logical than getting rid of another profitable property, though it is one of the better signals in both clusters. Maybe things have changed in San Francisco since the simulcast began, but being on AM didn’t used to be the liability there that it was most other places. FM tended to have more signal issues than AM due to terrain, and AM still billed well.
...the general erosion in KSDO
Good stations choices. Can't wait to see who'll pay top dollar for these outlets, plus they pull in good ratings too.
I wonder who's going to buy 99.7