• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

What Scenario Would a Broadcast Engineer Prefer?

Temperature inversion layers commonly form in the later afternoon and are more common over bodies of water, dense cities where heat from the pavement and buildings rise in a column. For VHF-UHF transmission sites located close, or right in a dense city, beam tilt is commonly used to keep a certain amount of the signal from being deflected away during afternoon drive times.

It's not rocket science actually. The antenna is placed in a way that best covers the city of license and community/market. At broadcast FM frequencies, the radiated signal is by no means a pinpoint.

Remember that adding antenna elements/bays focuses the signal toward the horizon. If one intentionally skewed the stacked elements, the antenna gain would be reduced, essentially reducing the effectiveness of the radiation pattern. Manufacturers typically use tuned reflecting pieces called 'parasitic elements' in various places on the antenna to direct the signal in a particular direction. As in your photo, sometimes the element is a screen, or depending on the design could be a piece of copper tubing of a certain length spaced at a precise distance from the radiating elements (bays).
There are other 'panel' style antennas that place one or more elements backed by a reflector next to each other at an angle (credit ERI):
View attachment 5411
Thank you for the explanation, Kelley! I had the chance to look at some diagrams. It looks like a properly engineered antenna with multiple bays *should* emit RF in a butterfly-like pattern (as opposed to a giant lobe, as you would get with the wattage being dumped into one antenna bay). At one time, I was under the false impression that the actual antenna element was a "pole" on top of the tower. Rather, it seems that these antenna elements can be mounted on a pole (on top of the tower) to provide the best possible coverage. Otherwise, they are just mounted to the side of the tower.
 
Back
Top Bottom