• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

NBCUniversal’s Peacock to Stream All Winter Olympics Coverage Live

In case you haven't noticed, they're really trying as hard as they can to get people to sign up for Peacock. If that means alienating you from the broadcast coverage, then they're fine with that. For NBC, the future is Peacock. For CBS, the future is Paramount.

But it depends. The night of the skating, when Nathan Chen won the Gold, they ran the entire competition without much interruption, and later said it had been sponsored by Toyota. So if they have something particularly hot that they expect people to watch, they find ways to lessen the spotload. But on a Saturday night, when viewing is low anyway, it probably doesn't matter.

Whatever they are doing with the broadcast coverage, prospective Peacock customers will transfer the broadcast presentation style to the streaming platform. Why pay for such bad commentary and the horrible U.S.A. team focus censorship (editing)?

It's actually about NBC's presentation--first impressions are everything! NBC hypes the games so much that the biographies, promotions, etc. are overdramatized. Wish the games were back on CBS again!
 
It's actually about NBC's presentation--first impressions are everything! NBC hypes the games so much that the biographies, promotions, etc. are overdramatized. Wish the games were back on CBS again!

I doubt a change of network would change the presentation. Jim Nance can be overly dramatic too. There is a style of sports documentary production that I see on all of the networks that seeks to create a sense of drama in the same way that talk radio today is designed to create drama. The reason is to build a sense of passion in the viewers. I was watching the Madden documentary, and I saw elements of it there as well.
 
I doubt a change of network would change the presentation. Jim Nance can be overly dramatic too. There is a style of sports documentary production that I see on all of the networks that seeks to create a sense of drama in the same way that talk radio today is designed to create drama. The reason is to build a sense of passion in the viewers. I was watching the Madden documentary, and I saw elements of it there as well.
The "rah-rah USA" approach began with ABC and has become, despite its critics, the established way to broadcast the Olympics. Barring hard evidence that this style is a major factor in the decline of viewer interest in the Games, no network would dare swim against the patriotic tide. The big problems this year have been the nearly empty venues and the announcing being done from Stamford rather than Beijing. The announcers' enthusiasm sounds phony with no increase in crowd noise to accompany it, and occasionally there's been confusion about what just happened in an event because the announcers are watching a video feed on a screen rather than the event itself.

Oh, and the longtime CBS sportscaster you cited does not share a surname with the late Boston/'New England Patriots running back. His name is Jim Nantz.
 
Last edited:
Worst ratings of NBC's olympics coverage.
The topline figure is that the Olympics averaged 11.4 million viewers across all of NBCU’s platforms in primetime. That’s down 42 percent from the 19.8 million average for the 2018 winter games in Pyeongchang, South Korea — in keeping with the trend both from the first few days of the games (and, in fact, closing the gap with four years ago a little bit) and the general decline of broadcast network ratings in the past four years.
 
Not shocking given that past olympics faced similar downward trends.
The other thing that must be kept in mind, even compared to the last winter Olympics, is the amount of people who prefer to watch the events later on Peacock or Comcast instead of watching the prime time offerings on NBC or USA. This is really the first winter Olympics when they've had that streaming/replay option on this large a scale. Many want to watch only the bits and events they're interested in rather than the patchwork of contests that NBC sometimes throws together on a given evening, or they prefer to watch the games themselves and skip the interviews and personal interest stories. For others, they may not have time or the ability to watch in prime-time, so they'll watch the stuff they're interested in later when they're able. All that takes away from the network TV ratings.
 
The other thing that must be kept in mind, even compared to the last winter Olympics, is the amount of people who prefer to watch the events later on Peacock or Comcast instead of watching the prime time offerings on NBC or USA. This is really the first winter Olympics when they've had that streaming/replay option on this large a scale. Many want to watch only the bits and events they're interested in rather than the patchwork of contests that NBC sometimes throws together on a given evening, or they prefer to watch the games themselves and skip the interviews and personal interest stories. For others, they may not have time or the ability to watch in prime-time, so they'll watch the stuff they're interested in later when they're able. All that takes away from the network TV ratings.
Yes that's correct too I remember NBC Sports Regional in the Bay Area had promotions during the NBA on NBC with Golden State Warriors to watch the Olympics on Peacock first before mentioning NBC Bay Area (KNTV) given that the NBC O&O's emphasize local news first in their promos.
 
The other thing that must be kept in mind, even compared to the last winter Olympics, is the amount of people who prefer to watch the events later on Peacock or Comcast instead of watching the prime time offerings on NBC or USA. This is really the first winter Olympics when they've had that streaming/replay option on this large a scale. Many want to watch only the bits and events they're interested in rather than the patchwork of contests that NBC sometimes throws together on a given evening, or they prefer to watch the games themselves and skip the interviews and personal interest stories. For others, they may not have time or the ability to watch in prime-time, so they'll watch the stuff they're interested in later when they're able. All that takes away from the network TV ratings.
The gold medal men's hockey game started at 11:30 p.m. EST. In fact, just about all the hockey games started at that time or even later. I watched just about all of them the next morning on Peacock.
 
The gold medal men's hockey game started at 11:30 p.m. EST. In fact, just about all the hockey games started at that time or even later. I watched just about all of them the next morning on Peacock.

The fact that they began out of prime time doesn't affect the prime time TV ratings. The main things they seemed to show in prime time were skating, skiing, and snowboarding. Lots of skating. Lots of men & women in sequins. Maybe some luge. The lack of NHL stars on the hockey team didn't' help, but hockey isn't much of a prime time sport anyway. Plus NBC doesn't do hockey anymore.
 
The fact that they began out of prime time doesn't affect the prime time TV ratings. The main things they seemed to show in prime time were skating, skiing, and snowboarding. Lots of skating. Lots of men & women in sequins. Maybe some luge. The lack of NHL stars on the hockey team didn't' help, but hockey isn't much of a prime time sport anyway. Plus NBC doesn't do hockey anymore.
So if the USA had reached the gold medal game, NBC would still refuse to give it a delayed showing in prime time just because the suits are still throwing a hissy fit over losing the NHL rights to ESPN and TNT?
 
So if the USA had reached the gold medal game, NBC would still refuse to give it a delayed showing in prime time just because the suits are still throwing a hissy fit over losing the NHL rights to ESPN and TNT?

It might come up in the conversation. A night of amateur hockey vs. Nathan Chen or more skating? The skating probably wins.

But really, the US hockey team without the NHL was going to have a rough time making it to the gold medal game. It's not 1980.
 
It might come up in the conversation. A night of amateur hockey vs. Nathan Chen or more skating? The skating probably wins.

But really, the US hockey team without the NHL was going to have a rough time making it to the gold medal game. It's not 1980.
True, although it took nine shootout rounds for Slovakia to eliminate the US in the quarterfinals. But yes, the two finalists, Finland and Russia, had rosters full of players from the second-best professional league in the world, the KHL, primarily a Russian league but which also includes a Finnish team as well as teams in Latvia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and China.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.
Back
Top Bottom