• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Musk, scientists call for halt to AI race sparked by ChatGPT

Y2kTheNewOldies

Y2kTheNewOldies

apnews.com

Musk, scientists call for halt to AI race sparked by ChatGPT

Are tech companies moving too fast in rolling out powerful artificial intelligence technology that could one day outsmart humans? That’s the conclusion of a group of prominent computer scientists and other tech industry notables such as Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak who are...
apnews.com apnews.com

www.reuters.com

Elon Musk and others urge AI pause, citing 'risks to society'

Elon Musk and a group of artificial intelligence experts and industry executives are calling for a six-month pause in developing systems more powerful than OpenAI's newly launched GPT-4, in an open letter citing potential risks to society.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com


Note for now AI Companies are in the hype phase where they get all the Venture Capitalists and Angel Investors all excited about stuff like ChatGPT. But we have to wait and see what are the long term effects of this tech at some point. Also we have to get regulatory framework on these devices.


March 29 (Reuters) - Elon Musk and a group of artificial intelligence experts and industry executives are calling for a six-month pause in developing systems more powerful than OpenAI's newly launched GPT-4, in an open letter citing potential risks to society.

Earlier this month, Microsoft-backed OpenAI unveiled the fourth iteration of its GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) AI program, which has wowed users by engaging them in human-like conversation, composing songs and summarising lengthy documents."Powerful AI systems should be developed only once we are confident that their effects will be positive and their risks will be manageable," said the letter issued by the Future of Life Institute.
Click to expand...
 
Y2kTheNewOldies said:
apnews.com

Musk, scientists call for halt to AI race sparked by ChatGPT

Are tech companies moving too fast in rolling out powerful artificial intelligence technology that could one day outsmart humans? That’s the conclusion of a group of prominent computer scientists and other tech industry notables such as Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak who are...
apnews.com apnews.com

www.reuters.com

Elon Musk and others urge AI pause, citing 'risks to society'

Elon Musk and a group of artificial intelligence experts and industry executives are calling for a six-month pause in developing systems more powerful than OpenAI's newly launched GPT-4, in an open letter citing potential risks to society.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com


Note for now AI Companies are in the hype phase where they get all the Venture Capitalists and Angel Investors all excited about stuff like ChatGPT. But we have to wait and see what are the long term effects of this tech at some point. Also we have to get regulatory framework on these devices.
Click to expand...
Elon: You can have your AI for $8.00 a month
 
Theater of My Mind said:
The real problem is there is no infrastructure to stop scammers and criminals from abusing AI technology.

Think telemarketers and computer hackers from untouchable countries are bad now? That's going to be the least of our worries once those types of people harness AI. It's going to be horrendous.
Click to expand...
Agreed too I knew there's hype generated in the past 6 months about Chat GPT and their AI competition all to get Venture Capitalists excited.

We need to see how Congress reacts to this one.
 
According to a story I heard on NPR yesterday, one of the biggest concerns, and why Musk and others are suggesting we pump the brakes a bit on AI, at least for several months, is that everyone needs to sit back, take a breath and understand all the implications, both positive and negative, of AI and the tech they're creating. The worst thing that could happen, and what they must try and avoid at all costs, is to create technologies like AI, robotics and the like that, ultimately, they themselves cannot control or that bad actors can use in their favor.

Y2kTheNewOldies said:
We need to see how Congress reacts to this one.
Click to expand...
Based on how Congress has reacted to many things lately, they're probably the last ones who should be involved. Even back when Congress was democratically controlled it was laughable when they were going to "grill" Mark Zuckerberg and really "stick it to him". What was blindly apparent from a number of the questions that were asked and comments that were made, was that the majority of those members of Congress didn't understand the first thing about Facebook, how it operates, how it makes money, etc. Most probably just got a 2 or 3 minute primer about Facebook from one of the young whippersnappers on their staff. I'm not sure we want folks like that making decisions or creating guidelines to govern AI.
 
Mikey Radio said:
According to a story I heard on NPR yesterday, one of the biggest concerns, and why Musk and others are suggesting we pump the brakes a bit on AI, at least for several months, is that everyone needs to sit back, take a breath and understand all the implications, both positive and negative, of AI and the tech they're creating. The worst thing that could happen, and what they must try and avoid at all costs, is to create technologies like AI, robotics and the like that, ultimately, they themselves cannot control or that bad actors can use in their favor.


Based on how Congress has reacted to many things lately, they're probably the last ones who should be involved. Even back when Congress was democratically controlled it was laughable when they were going to "grill" Mark Zuckerberg and really "stick it to him". What was blindly apparent from a number of the questions that were asked and comments that were made, was that the majority of those members of Congress didn't understand the first thing about Facebook, how it operates, how it makes money, etc. Most probably just got a 2 or 3 minute primer about Facebook from one of the young whippersnappers on their staff. I'm not sure we want folks like that making decisions or creating guidelines to govern AI.
Click to expand...
I still have a T-shirt with Zuckerberg's answer: "Senator, we sell ads"
 
www.reuters.com

Australian mayor readies world's first defamation lawsuit over ChatGPT content

A regional Australian mayor said he may sue OpenAI if it does not correct ChatGPT's false claims that he had served time in prison for bribery, in what would be the first defamation lawsuit against the automated text service.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com


Woah let's wait and see how this lawsuit plays out given that AI currently does not have updated information.


SYDNEY, April 5 (Reuters) - A regional Australian mayor said he may sue OpenAI if it does not correct ChatGPT's false claims that he had served time in prison for bribery, in what would be the first defamation lawsuit against the automated text service.

Brian Hood, who was elected mayor of Hepburn Shire, 120km (75 miles) northwest of Melbourne, last November, became concerned about his reputation when members of the public told him ChatGPT had falsely named him as a guilty party in a foreign bribery scandal involving a subsidiary of the Reserve Bank of Australia in the early 2000s.


Hood did work for the subsidiary, Note Printing Australia, but was the person who notified authorities about payment of bribes to foreign officials to win currency printing contracts, and was never charged with a crime, lawyers representing him said.
Click to expand...
www.reuters.com

Baidu sues Apple, app developers over fake Ernie bot apps

Chinese search engine giant Baidu , has filed lawsuits against "relevant" app developers and Apple Inc over fake copies of its Ernie bot app available on Apple's app store.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com


Here's another lawsuit this time in China Baidu inc sues Apple over bot.
 
Y2kTheNewOldies said:
www.reuters.com

Australian mayor readies world's first defamation lawsuit over ChatGPT content

A regional Australian mayor said he may sue OpenAI if it does not correct ChatGPT's false claims that he had served time in prison for bribery, in what would be the first defamation lawsuit against the automated text service.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com


Woah let's wait and see how this lawsuit plays out given that AI currently does not have updated information.



www.reuters.com

Baidu sues Apple, app developers over fake Ernie bot apps

Chinese search engine giant Baidu , has filed lawsuits against "relevant" app developers and Apple Inc over fake copies of its Ernie bot app available on Apple's app store.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com


Here's another lawsuit this time in China Baidu inc sues Apple over bot.
Click to expand...
ChatGPT can only use what it "knows" based on looking it up from Google or whatever---its database ends in 2021
 
Kelly A said:
What does AI or ChatGPT have to do with FCC Policy Debate?
Click to expand...
At some point the FCC has to step in and discuss about this. So far the debate about AI has been through Press Relations and how the Venture Capitalists are having some interest in this technology. It just has to be backed by reality though such as current studies and data.
 
Y2kTheNewOldies said:
At some point the FCC has to step in and discuss about this. So far the debate about AI has been through Press Relations and how the Venture Capitalists are having some interest in this technology. It just has to be backed by reality though such as current studies and data.
Click to expand...
AI isn't a communications issue. If it falls anywhere, it falls under Trade and Commerce. Likely the FTC.
 
Back
Top Bottom