• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KISW supporting local bands???

> > Interesting article from Lisa Wood. Here is the link:
> >
> > http://lisawood.blogspot.com/2006/02/why.html
> >
> > Glad to see this station has class to help out bands that
> > are busting their ass to make it in the biz. They should
> be
> > ashamed of themselves.
> >
>
> Why am I not surprised by this? It is after all an Entercom
> station.
>
And of course the obvious irony here is that Clear Channel is the good guy in all this....
 
My favorite part in all of this is Lisa Woods uttering the words 'I don't like drama'.

Ah....right.
 
> My favorite part in all of this is Lisa Woods uttering the
> words 'I don't like drama'.
>
> Ah....right.

HA! Good observation.
 
> > My favorite part in all of this is Lisa Woods uttering the
>
> > words 'I don't like drama'.
> >
> > Ah....right.
>
> HA! Good observation.
>

And this board isn't full of drama? You guys slam everyone on this board if they don't agree with you. I'm not sayin' your post doesn't have some truth to it. Obviously there's drama surrounding her because she's writing things that make other stations look bad. That's instant drama, nature of the beast, but it's a bit hypocritcal for you to point that finger...
 
> And this board isn't full of drama? You guys slam everyone
> on this board if they don't agree with you. I'm not sayin'
> your post doesn't have some truth to it. Obviously there's
> drama surrounding her because she's writing things that make
> other stations look bad. That's instant drama, nature of the
> beast, but it's a bit hypocritcal for you to point that
> finger...

I view creating your own blog spot and promoting it to the nth degree and talking to anyone who will let you rant a higher level of drama than coming onto a third party's radio board to discuss things.

I call someone who detests corporate radio, yet who works at Metro Traffic, owned by one of those 'corporate radio' folks, a hypocrite.

I call someone who is unable to adapt to today's paradigm of radio out of luck.

Radio research and consulting came into the mainstream in the mid 1980s. That means it has been around for 20+ years. For someone who comes into radio around the year 2000 and thought radio was all fun and playing all requests, that says the illusion of the requests et al was alive and well back then. Or, the person is delusional.

After someone steps behind a mic and throws hissy fits over not being able to play what they want to play. I call that selfish and childlike.

Overall, she comes over as someone who can't adapt to today's radio. And really, as pointed out earlier, it didn't happen just overnight. Her musings are fine and dandy to do; but to the people who have adapted and understand today's radio, her banter comes over as childish, immature and how she likes to portray herself as a victim.
 
> I view creating your own blog spot and promoting it to the
> nth degree and talking to anyone who will let you rant a
> higher level of drama than coming onto a third party's radio
> board to discuss things.
>
> I call someone who detests corporate radio, yet who works at
> Metro Traffic, owned by one of those 'corporate radio'
> folks, a hypocrite.
>
> I call someone who is unable to adapt to today's paradigm of
> radio out of luck.
>
> Radio research and consulting came into the mainstream in
> the mid 1980s. That means it has been around for 20+ years.
> For someone who comes into radio around the year 2000 and
> thought radio was all fun and playing all requests, that
> says the illusion of the requests et al was alive and well
> back then. Or, the person is delusional.
>
> After someone steps behind a mic and throws hissy fits over
> not being able to play what they want to play. I call that
> selfish and childlike.
>
> Overall, she comes over as someone who can't adapt to
> today's radio. And really, as pointed out earlier, it
> didn't happen just overnight. Her musings are fine and
> dandy to do; but to the people who have adapted and
> understand today's radio, her banter comes over as childish,
> immature and how she likes to portray herself as a victim.
>

I see your point and I don't whole heartedly disagree....however, radio stations like KEXP not only exist, but are thriving and there's something to be said for radio where DJs can play what they want. People are craving it. Even the stations that don't, say they do. The end lists it as one of their commandments, KPLZ says "we play what we want", JACK, which is all canned says "we play what we want", people love it.

When story after story in the papers run down how tired people are of "regular" radio and are choosing iPods, the internet and iTunes over it, there's something to that.

Another point (this came up in a discussion I had yesterday with a fellow commercial radio employee), is if people really didn't care, then why is she getting so much damn attention? If you have read her blog (and I'm guessing you have), newspapers go to her for interviews, conferences put her on media panels, colleges enlist her to speak to their classes, reclaim the media touts her as a "source"....I remember when I was surfing BBS boards the day KISW was announcing BJ Shea as Howard's replacement, there were countless entries that went to her blog first.

We can call her a whiner and a "victim", but the scarier part is that people are listening to her.
 
> > And this board isn't full of drama? You guys slam everyone
>
> > on this board if they don't agree with you. I'm not sayin'
>
> > your post doesn't have some truth to it. Obviously there's
>
> > drama surrounding her because she's writing things that
> make
> > other stations look bad. That's instant drama, nature of
> the
> > beast, but it's a bit hypocritcal for you to point that
> > finger...
>
> I view creating your own blog spot and promoting it to the
> nth degree and talking to anyone who will let you rant a
> higher level of drama than coming onto a third party's radio
> board to discuss things.
>
> I call someone who detests corporate radio, yet who works at
> Metro Traffic, owned by one of those 'corporate radio'
> folks, a hypocrite.
>
> I call someone who is unable to adapt to today's paradigm of
> radio out of luck.
>
> Radio research and consulting came into the mainstream in
> the mid 1980s. That means it has been around for 20+ years.
> For someone who comes into radio around the year 2000 and
> thought radio was all fun and playing all requests, that
> says the illusion of the requests et al was alive and well
> back then. Or, the person is delusional.
>
> After someone steps behind a mic and throws hissy fits over
> not being able to play what they want to play. I call that
> selfish and childlike.
>
> Overall, she comes over as someone who can't adapt to
> today's radio. And really, as pointed out earlier, it
> didn't happen just overnight. Her musings are fine and
> dandy to do; but to the people who have adapted and
> understand today's radio, her banter comes over as childish,
> immature and how she likes to portray herself as a victim.
>

Lets not forget that she gets a check from Clear Channel every month as well.
 
> > I view creating your own blog spot and promoting it to the
>
> > nth degree and talking to anyone who will let you rant a
> > higher level of drama than coming onto a third party's
> radio
> > board to discuss things.
> >
> > I call someone who detests corporate radio, yet who works
> at
> > Metro Traffic, owned by one of those 'corporate radio'
> > folks, a hypocrite.
> >
> > I call someone who is unable to adapt to today's paradigm
> of
> > radio out of luck.
> >
> > Radio research and consulting came into the mainstream in
> > the mid 1980s. That means it has been around for 20+
> years.
> > For someone who comes into radio around the year 2000 and
>
> > thought radio was all fun and playing all requests, that
> > says the illusion of the requests et al was alive and well
>
> > back then. Or, the person is delusional.
> >
> > After someone steps behind a mic and throws hissy fits
> over
> > not being able to play what they want to play. I call
> that
> > selfish and childlike.
> >
> > Overall, she comes over as someone who can't adapt to
> > today's radio. And really, as pointed out earlier, it
> > didn't happen just overnight. Her musings are fine and
> > dandy to do; but to the people who have adapted and
> > understand today's radio, her banter comes over as
> childish,
> > immature and how she likes to portray herself as a victim.
>
> >
>
> I see your point and I don't whole heartedly
> disagree....however, radio stations like KEXP not only
> exist, but are thriving and there's something to be said for
> radio where DJs can play what they want. People are craving
> it. Even the stations that don't, say they do. The end lists
> it as one of their commandments, KPLZ says "we play what we
> want", JACK, which is all canned says "we play what we
> want", people love it.

KEXP is NOT thriving, they have serious issues, including personnel issues. They couldn't afford to keep the KXOT "traslator" even.
>
> When story after story in the papers run down how tired
> people are of "regular" radio and are choosing iPods, the
> internet and iTunes over it, there's something to that.

They're still learning about new music from radio.
>
> Another point (this came up in a discussion I had yesterday
> with a fellow commercial radio employee), is if people
> really didn't care, then why is she getting so much damn
> attention? If you have read her blog (and I'm guessing you
> have), newspapers go to her for interviews, conferences put
> her on media panels, colleges enlist her to speak to their
> classes, reclaim the media touts her as a "source"....I
> remember when I was surfing BBS boards the day KISW was
> announcing BJ Shea as Howard's replacement, there were
> countless entries that went to her blog first.

She's getting attention from RADIO PEOPLE, not radio listeners. 99.99 percent of listeners in the market don't know who Lisa Wood is, nor do they give a damn.
>
> We can call her a whiner and a "victim", but the scarier
> part is that people are listening to her.
>
Who is listening to her? You?
 
> I see your point and I don't whole heartedly
> disagree....however, radio stations like KEXP not only
> exist, but are thriving and there's something to be said for
> radio where DJs can play what they want. People are craving
> it. Even the stations that don't, say they do. The end lists
> it as one of their commandments, KPLZ says "we play what we
> want", JACK, which is all canned says "we play what we
> want", people love it.
>
> When story after story in the papers run down how tired
> people are of "regular" radio and are choosing iPods, the
> internet and iTunes over it, there's something to that.
>
> Another point (this came up in a discussion I had yesterday
> with a fellow commercial radio employee), is if people
> really didn't care, then why is she getting so much damn
> attention? If you have read her blog (and I'm guessing you
> have), newspapers go to her for interviews, conferences put
> her on media panels, colleges enlist her to speak to their
> classes, reclaim the media touts her as a "source"....I
> remember when I was surfing BBS boards the day KISW was
> announcing BJ Shea as Howard's replacement, there were
> countless entries that went to her blog first.
>
> We can call her a whiner and a "victim", but the scarier
> part is that people are listening to her.

Good response.

I do disagree with some of your comments, such as KEXP's thriving. Shutting down KXPT and the behavior akin to big corporation money-grubbing at KEXP's top does not suggest overall health and smiles. That said, I would think that things are even worse at KLSY at this very second when you compare overall situations. But one of my sources tells me that things at KEXP both internally and somewhat externally are not good right now.

As for the 'playing anything we want,' we all know that's a farce line. It just solidifies the power of marketing and perception. BUT, it's something fresh, it's something new for Seattle, and people are eating it up. Seattle is likely to be one of the few Jack stations around in four or five years (whereas it's likely we're to see other Jack's reconsider their situation once their ratings don't achieve goals and their contracts with Sparknet expire).

As for commenting, people will always care about what others have to say. Heck, there are AMERICANS out there, scary as it is to say, that agree with Osama bin Laden and feel we got what we deserve on 9/11/01. People will listen to almost anything, it's their reaction and judgment is what counts.

Now, I'm not comparing Lisa to Osama bin Laden in any way, but the point is that both have something to say. And as mention earlier and in many other posts, that's perfectly fine.

And yes, I have read her blog on occasion; I would say about once every month or two. But, knowing the whole picture of things, she still portrays herself as a victim. I should know, because I did that in general life. But I was able to make some bold decisions and not only move on with my life, but even able to better it.

There will be people who will listen to her, and that's perfectly fine as well. The only thing I would demand of people in that instance to do is THINK. I have, and with my experience and knowledge of radio and Lisa's overall SOP, I came up with the conclusions authored earlier in this thread.
 
> > Another point (this came up in a discussion I had
> yesterday
> > with a fellow commercial radio employee), is if people
> > really didn't care, then why is she getting so much damn
> > attention? If you have read her blog (and I'm guessing you
>
> > have), newspapers go to her for interviews, conferences
> put
> > her on media panels, colleges enlist her to speak to their
>
> > classes, reclaim the media touts her as a "source"....I
> > remember when I was surfing BBS boards the day KISW was
> > announcing BJ Shea as Howard's replacement, there were
> > countless entries that went to her blog first.

Who is listening to her? You?

No, did you even read what I wrote above? Newspapers, college classes, media panels, other blogs....That's what I was referring to. READ before you respond.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.
Back
Top Bottom