Back in the 60's ... "WBZ, Radio 103"
Heck we even had station that were at .5 calling themselves 1/2, i.e. "(KUFO 106 and a half, from Galveston)
Then you would not have liked a station that we had here in Nashville which briefly (VERY briefly!) went by the very stupid name "104 the Core." They were (and still are, for that matter) at 104.5. The "Core" name came as the result of a very stupid "contest" in which they invited listeners to name their "new" station. They played back a call from a listener who (probably jokingly) said, "how about 104 the Core?" They apparently liked the name because it rhymed. They had this stupid name during the 2000-2001 time frame, which was part of the larger 1998-2003 time period when they literally had a different format every year! The "Core" format was very similar to their previous "Arrow" format of the mid-'90s, but I am guessing that by 2001, they no longer had the right to use that name. Just prior to naming themselves "the Core," they were very briefly known as "that '70s station," which was probably actually a better name than "the Core." My idea for a slogan for "the Core" was "you don't get the whole apple, just the core."I never liked the .5s rounding down. As we all learned in 2nd grade, a .5 rounds up.
And Los Angeles, CA
KTNQ 1020 Ten-Q in English and Spanish formats
I never liked the .5s rounding down...
I Wonder why it wasn't RX108? Most analog radio dials had a "108"
Somewhere earlier in this thread, I mentioned "Moo 102" (yes, that was the station's actual name there for a while!) at 102.9. Probably unnecessarily confusing, since they also had (and still have) a sister station at 102.5.How about a .9 rounding down? What is now 107.9 WOGT East Ridge/Chattanooga signed on as a great sounding CCM formatted station 107.9 WJRX calling themselves RX 107.
W149 sounds like an AM station at 1490 kHz, would that be correct?
WJRX might have changed their call because it could be pronounced W-jerks...