• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WSJ - State Department Document shows Rove and others should not have shared information

D

doc9464

Guest
WSJ - State Department Document shows Rove and others should not have shared information

Raw Story blog has posted an update on Rove section...

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Wall_...mo_made_clear_info_shouldnt_be_shar_0719.html

For conservatives and those on the right => WSJ has the information on their web site if you prefer to read it there:

http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB112170178721288385,00.html?mod=todays_us_page_one (registration required)

WSJ explains that that information identifying an agent and her role in her husband's intelligence-gathering mission was sensitive and shouldn't be shared, according to a person familiar with the document
 
Re: WSJ - State Department Document shows Rove and others should not have shared information

> Raw Story blog has posted an update on Rove section...
>
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Wall_Street_Journal_enters_Rove_fray> _State_Dept._memo_made_clear_info_shouldnt_be_shar_0719.html
>
>
> For conservatives and those on the right => WSJ has the
> information on their web site if you prefer to read it
> there:
>
http://online.wsj.com/ar> ticle/0,,SB112170178721288385,00.html?mod=todays_us_page_one
> (registration required)
>
> WSJ explains that that information identifying an agent and
> her role in her husband's intelligence-gathering mission was
> sensitive and shouldn't be shared, according to a person
> familiar with the document
>


(Yawn) ...and in the meantime the DNC considers whether to nominate Deep Throat classified-information-leaker-seeking-revenge-from-being-passed-up-in-promotions hero Mark Felt for Time Magazine's "Person Of The Year" award.
 
Re: WSJ - State Department Document shows Rove and others should not have shared information

Yawn all you want, the facts are in place....this administration is in serious trouble...



> (Yawn) ...and in the meantime the DNC considers whether
> to nominate Deep Throat
classified-informati> on-leaker-seeking-revenge-from-being-passed-up-in-promotions
> hero Mark Felt for Time Magazine's "Person Of The Year"
> award.
>
 
Tsk, tsk...

> Yawn all you want, the facts are in place....this
> administration is in serious trouble...

Oh, yeah, this is right up there with Watergate and Monica. Puh-lease...
 
Re: WSJ - State Department Document shows Rove and others should not have shared information

You know, the White House has enough to worry about with Mr. Rove beyond this particular scandal. Frankly, I don't care if the bean counters or fact diggers can prove whether Rove did or did not commit an actual crime - it really just was wrong to do it, and politically motivated. If I were dubya, I'd dump Rove gracefully and move on in the hopes that come election time, the Democrats don't completely sweep both houses of Congress and the White House two years later - which in my book would be a travesty.. but it's coming.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.
Back
Top Bottom