My take:
I think iHM is looking to reduce management headcount in general and also looking to place its highest performers in its most important regions.
Mr. Corvino is now responsible for a significantly larger pool of assets than was the case in Detroit, where 4 of 5 FMs are in darn good shape (and even the laggard probably isn't performing all that badly).
I think iHM is looking to reduce management headcount in general and also looking to place its highest performers in its most important regions.
Mr. Corvino is now responsible for a significantly larger pool of assets than was the case in Detroit, where 4 of 5 FMs are in darn good shape (and even the laggard probably isn't performing all that badly).