• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Copps Seeking 3-Year Renewals

FCC Comissioner Michael Copps took part in a public forum in Pittsburgh called "Owning The Airwaves." Here's a brief excerpt from Inside Radio.

FCC commissioner Michael Copps renewed his call for tougher license renewals during a media ownership forum last night in Pittsburgh. Copps says the current eight-year cycle should be cut to three years and that the FCC “take a good, hard look” to see if stations are doing enough to keep their license. Copps also backed the idea of requiring station public files be put online.

My first question to the Commissioner is: What is he doing to achieve his goal? Has he put forth a proposal within the Commission? Or is he just talking about it, hoping someone else will do it? These rule changes have to start somewhere, and Copps doesn't seem to be able to figure out how to do it.

My second question: How will he pay for all the new staffers to handle the renewals? The reason the Commission moved to 8 year renewals was because there were too many stations and too few staffers to process renewals every 3 years. That led to backlogs in renewals. Returning to the old system would require hiring more staff at a time when Congress is looking to cut back on federal employees.

As for requiring public files to be online, a lot of stations already do it, even though it's not required. And I think it would be useful for someone interested in public file material to make a visit to the station. I know it may seem old fashioned, but it would demonstrate a real interest, and also bring people from the community into the station.
 
In almost 28 years of ownership only had one member of the "public" come in to see the public file. And that was another broadcaster who wanted to look at our frequency change application to see whether it would conflict with his plans (it didn't). Information that is now available on-line.

Putting the entire public file on-line (particularly the "issues" info and public letters) just encourages the professional "public interest" folks who need to constantly gin up new causes to pay for their corner offices in northern Virginia. Much easier to sit at a keyboard all day and create scathing reports about all these music stations failing to cover public affairs.

The local "public" can hear everything that we do OFF AIR! (That's why it is called broadcasting, folks). They will let us know if we do something they don't like. Of course, the public's concerns are usually related to programming issues that Commissioner Copps and his band of lefties care less about.

Copps would have stations carry 25% of their programming from local sources. No national news, local news only. More political news, political debates, extensive coverage over whether red roses or white should be planted by the garden club, etc.

That's all very nice, returning radio to the 50's, but who is going to pay for radio that no-one will listen to? (Yes, I know, we all pay a radio tax and let a government corporation like the BBC run all the stations).
 
TomT said:
Putting the entire public file on-line (particularly the "issues" info and public letters) just encourages the professional "public interest" folks who need to constantly gin up new causes to pay for their corner offices in northern Virginia. Much easier to sit at a keyboard all day and create scathing reports about all these music stations failing to cover public affairs.

Exactly, which is what Copps wants. But he's the only one. The only reason the FCC regulates broadcasting is because the current law requires them to. They won't be adding new regulations with an aging technology when there are more exciting areas for them to regulate.
 
Whever he goes....Nag-Nag-Nag....I think he wants the title "Gestapo" added to his duties..... Some nice black gloves and a whip would be nice....
 
skippertthomas said:
Whever he goes....Nag-Nag-Nag....I think he wants the title "Gestapo" added to his duties..... Some nice black gloves and a whip would be nice....

Wow...talk about a low class post. Whenever you start invoking the Nazis, it pretty much means you have nothing worthwhile to say.

While I agree with much of what Copps has had to say over the years, I do end up parting company with him on the three year renewals. It will just increase the amount of paperwork that everyone has to deal with, and will accomplish absolutely nothing. Copps should instead stick to opposing mergers and fighting for stricter ownership limits...
 
When you start filling out all the stuff for your owners every third year, you're almost fulltime for that year doing that and ignoring the bottom line in a smaller market... That's was my gruff.. I am usually a Norman Vincent Peale guy, but it rubs me as having done that stuff in the past.. I can understand a small operation that has to spend that much time on renewals... Like a US Rep spends half of his two year term running for re-election.... Gestapo is not just used in the terms of the socialists group mentioned from above, it has been used long before that in certain language and cultural circles... Not one evil group can take ownership.. KGB, CIA and others have their terms for the same position.. I am cooler this afternoon.. Funny question? When someone right of center politically, uses those terms, they get ripped... I you are left of center politically, it is OK and no one rips into their banter...??? Terms are such, if you play to that angle then freedom of good or bad speech is destroyed and the 'thought police' will control us... I don't agree with those guys in the white hoods, but as silly and dangerous they are, they have a right to speak their words, even if I don't agree with them.. Same with Hogie Charmichael's influenced comment from the other end... Nuff said for today..
 
There must be some more palatable event or process that would give us what I assume Copps would like the three year renewal to do for the industry.....no, make that what the three year renewal COULD DO for society...

Station licensees used to know that they were stewards of a piece of publicly owned spectrum. They knew that poor performance could result in a challenge from another applicant at renewal time. The broadcast industry was not comortable with the "sword of Damocles" constantly over their head.... and the FCC was apparently never capable of play the part of Solomon when the licensee and the challenging applicant wanted to split the baby.

Today's licensees know there is probably a better probability that some Native American tribe will lose their reservation than the probability a licensee will ever have to forfeit his/her broadcast property.

Most of us spend a working lifetime knowing our job could disappear this year and it keeps us on our toes. There needs to be some rational, mature, equitable mechanism that now and then goads the licensee somewhere tender on his backside with the message: Serve the people of your community well or take a hike.

At this point I have the same problem the FCC would have: And "serve your community well" means WHAT?
 
Goat Rodeo Cowboy said:
Station licensees used to know that they were stewards of a piece of publicly owned spectrum.

That concept died a very long time ago. Spectrum also used to be scarce. Not any more. The government used to do its job. Not any more. There are some now who don't believe in the concept of "public ownership," either. That may go away and everything will be up for grabs.

Goat Rodeo Cowboy said:
And "serve your community well" means WHAT?

No one has ever lost their license for not serving their community. Period. The whole thing is fiction, and everyone knows it.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.
Back
Top Bottom