"If you interested in the AM call the owner, I assure you that you can it get for less than that and maybe substantially less."
Does the name Dave Wagenvoord ring a bell?
Does the name Dave Wagenvoord ring a bell?
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
A new era for Part 15 FM?
- Thread starter edarmsttrong
- Start date
LibertyNT said:could just buy a 200 watt Daytimer above 1500 Khz.
That gets about the same range as a Part 15 AM LOL!
I love AM too but hell, its a very noisy band.
Some people will still listen considering the format. But if Part 15 FM could
be as good as Part 15 AM I could guarantee you that everyone
would move to FM if they could.
Ummm, I wouldn't. I think music sounds kind of "funny" on FM.
I'm not being obtuse, I really do prefer how music sounds on AM when it's done right.
I've had FM oscillators, ( C Crane unit died ) and they sound OK, but the music doesn't breathe and live like a
densely modulated AM, and can never thunder or thud like 150% asymmetric modulation does .
Did anyone else notice what the proposed addition to Part 15.3 states?
The proposed addition is:
§ 15.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
(hh) Wireless Audio Device. An intentional radiator that is used to transmit voice, music or other audio
material over a short distance. Transmissions may be either analog or digital. Data transmissions are not
permitted except for short strings such as recognition codes necessary to ensure the functionality of a
system. Transmission of audio material to the public switched telephone network and private and
commercial wireless systems and networks is not permitted.
My question is- If analog or digital transmissions are permitted, how can data transmissions not be permitted? Wouldn't a digital transmission be a long, continuous string of data?
I'm sorry I missed the NPRM comment period for this...I can't wait until these new rules are in effect. And, then I'll kiss all the long-ground-radiator bullsh*t goodbye!
The proposed addition is:
§ 15.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
(hh) Wireless Audio Device. An intentional radiator that is used to transmit voice, music or other audio
material over a short distance. Transmissions may be either analog or digital. Data transmissions are not
permitted except for short strings such as recognition codes necessary to ensure the functionality of a
system. Transmission of audio material to the public switched telephone network and private and
commercial wireless systems and networks is not permitted.
My question is- If analog or digital transmissions are permitted, how can data transmissions not be permitted? Wouldn't a digital transmission be a long, continuous string of data?
I'm sorry I missed the NPRM comment period for this...I can't wait until these new rules are in effect. And, then I'll kiss all the long-ground-radiator bullsh*t goodbye!
- Status