The "World Famous KROQ" created an audience for alternative that even influences CHR and gold based stations. And advertisers consider the format mainstream and to have a good return on investment.
Not to mention the World Famous KROQ Weenie Roast
The "World Famous KROQ" created an audience for alternative that even influences CHR and gold based stations. And advertisers consider the format mainstream and to have a good return on investment.
Houston has no Classic Hits station. And while Boston's WROR calls itself "Classic Hits," I don't think a station that plays no Michael Jackson, Madonna, Whitney Houston or Gloria Estefan really is "Classic Hits." It only plays Rock Hits.
I think you will see a classic hits station pop up in Boston soon.
Of course Boston HAD a classic hits station with WODS before it flipped to AMP. Entercom has a lower rated rock station with WAAF, so they might flip that one. Cumulus is running a classic hits station in nearby Worcester, but it isn't a full market signal. Might Beasley give up alternative on WBOS? Lots of options.
Cumulus’ classic hits 100.1 The Pike in Worcester is the same as WROR, only plays rock hits.
Boston's heritage is rock, not rhythmic. WRKO back in the day was slow to add soul hits to its playlist, didn't even play many of the James Brown songs that showed up on other markets' Top 40 stations. Research probably shows that Boston baby boomers and Gen X'ers prefer a rock-based classic hits format over one with too much pop and R&B. WROR's ratings certainly don't indicate that their listeners are hungering for more Stylistics and Spinners, and less Seger and Springsteen.
True. Kiss was a dominant CHR under Sunny Joe, and those 12-34 year old listeners are now 30 years older. "...adjusted for competitors and market history/conditions..." being a key factorTime marches on and classic hits is now centered in the 80s. The 80s in Boston...yeah I give ya WBCN but just as dominant with a more rhythmic lean than most any chr's at the time was Sunny Joe White's Kiss 108. Sure, it was gravy to add to the hits in the fact that the market didn't have an fm urban outlet, but there is no reason for Boston to be the only city without an 80s pop focused classic hits station when in so many different markets, 80s pop (adjusted for competitors and market history/conditions) gets very nice 25-54s.
Boston to be the only city without an 80s pop focused classic hits station
Time marches on and classic hits is now centered in the 80s. The 80s in Boston...yeah I give ya WBCN but just as dominant with a more rhythmic lean than most any chr's at the time was Sunny Joe White's Kiss 108. Sure, it was gravy to add to the hits in the fact that the market didn't have an fm urban outlet, but there is no reason for Boston to be the only city without an 80s pop focused classic hits station when in so many different markets, 80s pop (adjusted for competitors and market history/conditions) gets very nice 25-54s.
And with a high Hispanic population at that!
Classic Rock Hits seems like poor long term strategy in that the Rock genre has been an ever decreasing niche' since about 1990. Pop leaning Classic Hits theoretically should have the ability to evolve, conceivably forever!
Well in terms of active rock, yes. In terms of classic rock, you'd be surprised. Classic rock generally attracts a younger audience than classic hits. The reason these stations are incorporating rock songs in their playlist is to bring the average age down. Meantime, the classic hits demo is pretty solid as over 45.
What I notice is younger audiences don't listen to classic rock because it's the music of their youth, but because they prefer it to current rock. Classic rock to them isn't burdened by 40 years of airplay, because they weren't alive for it. But when Lynyrd Skynyrd or Led Zepplin gets played, young audiences respond as though it's current music. I see this over and over at concerts where cover bands or DJs play classic rock, but not classic hits. You're also seeing this on alternative stations, where 25-30 year old songs are being included because 20-somethings love to hear them.
Does this apply to radio in that Classic Rock stations actually do well in 18-34?
Depends on the market. In Philadelphia, classic rock WMGK is #1 18-34, tied with WBEB. Meanwhile, classic hits WOGL isn't even in the Top 10. It's #7 if you add 34-49.
It's a far shorter leap from Skynyrd to System of a Down than from Beach Boys to Post Malone.
Well in terms of active rock, yes. In terms of classic rock, you'd be surprised. Classic rock generally attracts a younger audience than classic hits. The reason these stations are incorporating rock songs in their playlist is to bring the average age down. Meantime, the classic hits demo is pretty solid as over 45.
What I notice is younger audiences don't listen to classic rock because it's the music of their youth, but because they prefer it to current rock. Classic rock to them isn't burdened by 40 years of airplay, because they weren't alive for it. But when Lynyrd Skynyrd or Led Zepplin gets played, young audiences respond as though it's current music. I see this over and over at concerts where cover bands or DJs play classic rock, but not classic hits. You're also seeing this on alternative stations, where 25-30 year old songs are being included because 20-somethings love to hear them.
Wonder if Guitar Hero had something to do with that?