• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Radio World guest column: Replace AM band with DRM on 45 - 50 MHz band

When I first heard of this proposal by Larry Todd of WRNJ Radio in New Jersey, I thought it was an excellent idea to move all current AM stations to the presently little used spectrum of 45-50 MHz, which is a portion of the original Apex FM band (42-50 MHz) used by the FM inventor Edwin Armstrong in the 1930s to mid 1940s, for an all new digital broadcast band utilizing the international DRM+ broadcasting standard. However, after reading the comments of some of the most intelligent people on the Radio Discussions board, I have come to the realization that this might be extremely difficult to implement due to the FCC's reluctance in considering proposals that will bring radio into the 21st Century in the United States.

One of the advantages outlined in this article is that the plan will finally end the antiquated, outdated, and technically inferior AM band in the United States. In addition to killing off the nearly 100-year-old AM band in the United States, another advantage is that it will address and alleviate the overcrowding on the FM band due to the excess of translators and LPFMs that are cluttering up the FM band currently. However, there are other significant obstacles that will prevent this plan from being implemented in the United States such as music copyright royalties contracts that would probably have to be changed in order to ensure that music producers, songwriters, performers, musicians, and other people within the music industry are adequately compensated for their art. Although those in the music industry will get paid more for their work, the radio stations, on the other hand, will have to pay more in royalty fees, which will make it very difficult for radio stations to make a profit in order to stay on the air. In order to compensate for the increased royalty fees, the radio station will have to increase spot rates for advertising, which means the station will have to play more commercials so they can stay in business. Overall, this will have a detrimental effect on broadcasting in the future.

In order to solve this problem, what are some of your suggestions of how the FCC can get rid of the antiquated AM band in the United States and move these stations to a new frequency band that provides less electromagnetic interference and nighttime skywave interference issues? Also, how would you alleviate the overcrowding on the FM dial caused by an excessive number of translators and LPFMs that are currently cluttering up the band? Do you have any plans that will solve the current issues plaguing both AM and FM radio and will also help solve the issues between the radio and the music industries so that an all digital radio in the United States will be a reality in the long term?
 
Last edited:
In order to solve this problem, what are some of your suggestions of how the FCC can get rid of the antiquated AM band in the United States and move these stations to a new frequency band that provides less electromagnetic interference and nighttime skywave interference issues? Also, how would you alleviate the overcrowding on the FM dial caused by an excessive number of translators and LPFMs that are currently cluttering up the band? Do you have any plans that will solve the current issues plaguing both AM and FM radio and will also help solve the issues between the radio and the music industries so that an all digital radio in the United States will be a reality in the long term?

People are not buying stand-alone radios of any kind. They buy smartphones and smartspeakers.

A new band will not get traction. Listeners have too many choices now, and they want them all on a single device.

The issues on pure digital broadcasting seem without solution. No digital source other than the paid satellite service has found a profitable business model.
 
Sunset. Look at LW and Shortwave and MW in other than US. They are close to fading away completely, but as long as there is regulatory authority to transmit on the band, somebody will be there.

It all depends. In some nations, where AM was not restricted by what are, today, very low power levels incapable of covering sprawling urban areas, AM is healthy.

In Argentina, nearly half the audience is on AM. And the significant AMs, more than a dozen of them, are 50 kw to 100 kw and not directional... on channels like 590, 630, 710, 750, 790, 870, 910, 950, 990, 1030, 1070. Big signals with full market coverage and very good local talk and sports programming.

In other places where FM developed with few restrictions, the AMs are for the most part dying.

And in still others like Canada and Mexico, the government has encouraged AM stations to turn in their licenses and move to FM. But the US licensed too many stations to begin with, so AMs can't move to FM other than with low powered translators.

The real issue is not AM, FM, SW, etc. It is the erosion of time spent listening to any kind of radio RF signal. It's all moving to streamed distribution.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.
Back
Top Bottom