Is the business model for statewide radio news networks in trouble?
It isn't a total surprise that after the announcement of the Pennsylvania state radio network closing (and subsequent takeover by new ownership) that we'd hear about another example.
But I didn't expect it to come from close to home. One of my cohorts from my days in Learfield's old Des Moines traffic operation at RadioIowa posted on his Facebook page yesterday that he voiced his last newscast for Learfield's Nebraska News Network. RadioIowa was the incubator for NNN some fifteen years ago and it eventually morphed into its own entity, although its morning newscasts were still produced from the mother-ship at RadioIowa.
Supposedly, Learfield was still turning a profit with NNN but the trend-line was down, so they pulled the plug.
Learfield over the years has changed its focus over the years from statewide news and farm networks to the much more lucrative sports broadcasting and marketing business. Clyde Lear, I think, would have kept NNN going in the old days if it were possible. But he sold his empire to his lieutenants some years ago and Learfield is a much larger entity today.
Learfield execs probably decided NNN wasn't worth the time and trouble to shop it to a buyer, although one surfaced for the Pennsylvania newsnet.
Is this endemic of a larger trend where journalism has become harder to monetize, or is this more of a case where the corporate owner has changed focus away from its news product?
It isn't a total surprise that after the announcement of the Pennsylvania state radio network closing (and subsequent takeover by new ownership) that we'd hear about another example.
But I didn't expect it to come from close to home. One of my cohorts from my days in Learfield's old Des Moines traffic operation at RadioIowa posted on his Facebook page yesterday that he voiced his last newscast for Learfield's Nebraska News Network. RadioIowa was the incubator for NNN some fifteen years ago and it eventually morphed into its own entity, although its morning newscasts were still produced from the mother-ship at RadioIowa.
Supposedly, Learfield was still turning a profit with NNN but the trend-line was down, so they pulled the plug.
Learfield over the years has changed its focus over the years from statewide news and farm networks to the much more lucrative sports broadcasting and marketing business. Clyde Lear, I think, would have kept NNN going in the old days if it were possible. But he sold his empire to his lieutenants some years ago and Learfield is a much larger entity today.
Learfield execs probably decided NNN wasn't worth the time and trouble to shop it to a buyer, although one surfaced for the Pennsylvania newsnet.
Is this endemic of a larger trend where journalism has become harder to monetize, or is this more of a case where the corporate owner has changed focus away from its news product?
Last edited: