Where you make sense, I think that as long as the old WODS classic hits/oldies format continues on HD-2, they will keep the name. Typical radio, hold those callsigns as long as they have some meaning.New York's "Alt 92.3" recently shed their WBMP callsign. I don't understand why they didn't simply shift them off to "Boston's Amp"?
Because in this PPM world, call signs mean nothing and are not worth the paperwork and expense to change them.
Ask anyone under 35 what W O D S is and they will shrug, say AMP 103 and they know exactly what it is.
I think that can also be said for many other stations. How many people know know that the The Sports Hub is WBZ FM. I have know idea what the call letters are for the 2 Country stations or the Hip Hop station at 96.9.
Ask anyone under 35 what W O D S is and they will shrug, ....
Because in this PPM world, call signs mean nothing and are not worth the paperwork and expense to change them.
Ask anyone under 35 what W O D S is and they will shrug, say AMP 103 and they know exactly what it is.
So why has Entercom wasted the time changing call letters on numerous other stations since acquiring CBS Radio? Mix 104.1 included?
Anyone know the legal calls for any translator off the top of their head? Probably not. But we either know their positioning slogan or the calls of the AM they are tied to.
Ask 105.7 how that WROR call thing worked out for them, They still have the calls, the concept was dead on arrival.
Would you kindly explain the last six words in the above?
Well if you don't mind I will quote Eli Polonski, who I think we can agree is a not only in the industry, but also someone with some knowledge of the industry.
In a thread on this board, about Ken Shelton he said, and I quote
"After WBCN, he was on WZLX and then WBOS for a while. His last area on-air gig that I know of was at WROR about six years ago when they briefly tried switching from classic hits to a classic AOR format. They hired Ken as a voice that would recall Boston AOR radio in the '70s and '80s. The experiment was unfortunately a ratings failure, and after two declining books they went back to the classic hits format, and let Ken go."
I don't know of anyone who was around at the time that thought it went well, do you?
Also from Eli, same topic
"And also around that time, "Timeless Rock & Roll Classics". It was WROR's classic Boston AOR recreation experiment attempt of 2001. I and a few other aficionados of the late '60s/'70s AOR deep cuts that they were sprinkling in thought it was pretty cool, but it flopped badly in the ratings. After two nosediving books, it was back to classic hits, and their ratings came back up."
WHAT "concept was dead on arrival"?
You cite instances of WROR - I assume you mean 105.7 WROR - and its attempted forays into AOR, but I am not able to connect the dots about a DOA "concept".
I believe what he meant about “DOA” was the concept of whether the “heritage” callsign from the old 98.5 WROR benefits today’s 105.7 WROR.
My answer was maybe a little to help 105.7 launch as WROR 22 years ago in 1996, but since then, their performance has been due to the programming presented, not the call letters.
I believe what he meant about “DOA” was the concept of whether the “heritage” callsign from the old 98.5 WROR benefits today’s 105.7 WROR.
My answer was maybe a little to help 105.7 launch as WROR 22 years ago in 1996, but since then, their performance has been due to the programming presented, not the call letters.
Certainly, WROR 98.5 was a player in the 80's fueled by Joe and Andy but were the calls that important? 105.7 should have explored getting back the WVBF callsign