• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Alex Jones Is Facing Two Lawsuits From Sandy Hook Families

RadioPatrol said:
https://apnews.com/59e8b23c37514ceca297f8349f277379

Here is update now the judge investigating Alex Jones has now been a target of Harassment.
Click to expand...

I agree here .The trolls or bots posting crap should get nailed for it.Should be moderated immediately and the data logged .Got a point earlier from Frank in this thread is about some listeners could act.Some of them in the comments section......
 
Last edited:
TheBigA said:
Meanwhile, this has happened:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/reddi...ubreddit-the_donald-over-anti-police-threats/

It's really simple: Make violent threats on a public message board, and you get shut down.

If any person made those kinds of threats in the middle of a public place, they would get arrested.

It's not about politics, it's about violent behavior.
Click to expand...

Agree 100 percent on that.Any threats from anybody should get a knock on their door and get arrested.No need for it.
 
RadioPatrol said:
Article is persistent ever since the Alex Jones fall out came into play.
Click to expand...

Once again, when you open the door to user-generated content, the question is what is acceptable content?

Is content that violates copyright laws or libel laws or any other laws acceptable as free speech?
 
TheBigA said:
Once again, when you open the door to user-generated content, the question is what is acceptable content?

Is content that violates copyright laws or libel laws or any other laws acceptable as free speech?
Click to expand...

Screw YT.I dump all my stuff on there and went to friendly video sites. .If they want to lock up AJ for using content on his show.You mind as will lock up .They mind as will lock up 1000's of other media co's and people too.
 
TheBigA said:
I don't know that anybody has been "locked up."
Click to expand...

OK.As I figure.AJ and rest us does not have to worry about going to jail.I do agree on the copyright laws on content as if somebody sells illegal copies of any kind of copyrighted content"CDs DVD or digital file copies" online"eBay ETC" and on the street....Lock all of them up.....One good reason I left YT is posting video clips on there.I'm not making any money on there.
 
I heard the candidate Trump interview on AJ's show. They were talking like they were old friends- globalists, new world order, etc.
 
Last edited:
kf4rca said:
I heard the candidate Trump interview on AJ's show. They were talking like they were old friends- globalists, new world order, etc.
Click to expand...

I heard that show live .This was around after awhile in tuning AJ in on shortwave..
Yes they are both on the same wavelength or page.
 
I heard Bernie Sanders interview also. He gave a pretty good interview and was not into all the socialist agenda stuff he's into now.
But did you know Bernie lived with his folks till he was 40. Man, I wanted to get out of there when I was about 16.
 
kf4rca said:
I heard Bernie Sanders interview also. He gave a pretty good interview and was not into all the socialist agenda stuff he's into now.
But did you know Bernie lived with his folks till he was 40. Man, I wanted to get out of there when I was about 16.
Click to expand...

I heard it too.
 
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/459297-youtube-takes-down-infowars-again

And Youtube has issued another removal on Alex Jones again.

Infowars briefly returned to YouTube before being removed from the platform Thursday, a spokesperson for the video platform confirmed to The Hill.

"The War Room," Infowars’ program for afternoon commuters, relaunched its YouTube channel on Wednesday, Vice News first reported.

That move came a day after Youtube CEO Susan Wojcicki invited "offensive" content back onto the site in a letter to creators.


“Without an open system, diverse and authentic voices have trouble breaking through,” she wrote in the letter. “I believe preserving an open platform is more important than ever.”

"A commitment to openness is not easy. It sometimes means leaving up content that is outside the mainstream, controversial or even offensive," she said.

In the first video uploaded to the channel, "War Room" host Owen Shroyer reportedly read a portion of Wojcicki's letter in a video titled “Breaking! YouTube CEO says ‘Alex Jones’ and ‘Infowars Ban Is Over,'” according
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.
Back
Top Bottom