• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Will Anyone Have the Guts To Expose Local Broadcast Sexual Predators Living or Dead?

Status
Not open for further replies.
If it is true these creeps dead or alive should be exposed but this website is probably not the right place. Maybe someone should drop a dime to the likes of Andrea Estes at The Boston Globe.
 
Tilden said:
I do but if I do I would probably be banned from this site.
Click to expand...

What? You'd remain silent and let sexual predators stalk the unaware out of the fear of being banned from a website? Aren't you the solid citizen. But, if that's what's stopping you, why not go to one of the papers or Boston Magazine? It wasn't a film aficionado site that opened the floodgates with the Weinstein accusations, it was the NYT, Heck, it wasn't the specialty broadcast media that pounded the crap out of Gamere and Parenteau. So why do you have to name-names on RadioInfo boards, a site known of and read almost solely by radio-heads and geeks, when if you actually had the goods on 'many', or even a few, broadcast media predators there would be hundreds, if not thousands, of publications and websites standing in line to have a chat with you? Of course, to ask the question is to answer it.
 
Tilden said:
If it is true these creeps dead or alive should be exposed but this website is probably not the right place. Maybe someone should drop a dime to the likes of Andrea Estes at The Boston Globe.
Click to expand...

So, now you're maintaining that if you dimed them out to the Globe you'd be banned from further posting on RadioInfo? Just exactly how does that work? Or are you saying you're now going to call Estes? Since you said you could name many, aren't all your accusations true? To riff on the old saw, Info talks, and BS walks.
 
TSBench said:
So, now you're maintaining that if you dimed them out to the Globe you'd be banned from further posting on RadioInfo? Just exactly how does that work? Or are you saying you're now going to call Estes? Since you said you could name many, aren't all your accusations true? To riff on the old saw, Info talks, and BS walks.
Click to expand...

And any self-respecting news medium will insist on some form of verification. What is now characterizing the Hollywood Witch Hunt is lack of substantiation or verification. I fear that the need to change attitudes in the entertainment business will be clouded by people who just want to harm their enemies. Joe McCarthy would be proud.

Hopefully, though, the movie industry will set up some form of review board to separate real crimes from ill-intentioned accusations.
 
TSBench said:
So, now you're maintaining that if you dimed them out to the Globe you'd be banned from further posting on RadioInfo? Just exactly how does that work? Or are you saying you're now going to call Estes? Since you said you could name many, aren't all your accusations true? To riff on the old saw, Info talks, and BS walks.
Click to expand...

Point is that The Globe would add credibility and substantiation as they did with their Spotlight on pedophile priests. Maybe a dime has already been dropped.
 
Tilden said:
Point is that The Globe would add credibility and substantiation as they did with their Spotlight on pedophile priests. Maybe a dime has already been dropped.
Click to expand...

Let's go to the tape......"Will Anyone Have the Guts To Expose Local Broadcast Sexual Predators Living or Dead?
Could name many."

Yeah, I'll wait until it doesn't come out in the Globe.

I hate intention obtuseness in people. Let's try this again. If you can name many, name them, in another venue if need be. Unless of course, you can't prove it, which you can't, which would make it actionable. Seems like you want what you say to be covered under somebody elses E&O insurance policy. In other words, you were just blowing smoke. Why didn't you say so?
 
Third Floor Bulfinch Place more accurate...What rots from the head?
 
frankberry said:
Please be careful. You may not "out" anyone on this website.
We don't do "libel."
Click to expand...

Fear not, FB. We old-timers have all seen this movie before. Every one of Tilden's posts eventually circles back to his original intent, badmouthing someone who fired him during his radio career; an evil boss who had made a pact with Satan. The posts just about write themselves.
 
Understandable. Will not name names here although those to be named are not among the living. Unless they came back as zombies which is quite possible in some cases -:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom