Things I could See Happen If Trump Cuts FCC Funding By 40%
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Things I could See Happen If Trump Cuts FCC Funding By 40%

  1. #1

    Exclamation Things I could See Happen If Trump Cuts FCC Funding By 40%

    Here are somethings I could see if Trump does major cuts to FCC funding

    Many new pirate radio station start broadcasting
    A Radio Or TV Station license says 5kw and there transmitter is ratted for 10kw they up the power to max
    AM stations that should powder down or decrease power at night will stay on 24/7
    TV and Radio station might play stuff without being edited
    LPFM stations will run with a lot more power

    With funding take a major hit and FCC field offices closing there will be no one to stop Radio and TV free for all that could be coming.
    Phat Beats Radio playing the best Rap Hiphop R&B Soul Funk from the 1970s to early 2000s http://phatbeatsradio.tumblr.com

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by DJboutit3 View Post
    Here are somethings I could see if Trump does major cuts to FCC funding
    The Congress appropriates money, not the President.

    I was led to believe that in the last budget, the FCC's appropriation was cut basically to zero: They were given operational funding that was supposed to be reimbursed by fees and spectrum sales.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Solano County, California
    Posts
    4,809
    http://current.org/2017/01/gop-commi...-broadcasters/

    Does this count as your concerns

    The FCC’s two Republican commissioners have volunteered to overturn new agency regulations requiring public broadcasters to start disclosing personal information about their board members and officers.

    Signaling a policy change that many public broadcasters would welcome from the FCC, Commissioners Ajit Pai and Michael O’Rielly objected to a Wednesday decision by the Media Bureau to reject pending petitions to reconsider the rules, which were to kick in later this year.

    The regulations require public broadcasters to provide sensitive personal data on their leadership. Dozens of public broadcast licensees from across the U.S. had asked the FCC to reconsider how the rules would affect their ability to recruit and retain board members. With the Media Bureau pressing ahead to conclude the rule-making as Democrats prepared to cede control, Pai and O’Rielly asserted themselves as the ascendant majority.

    Adopted by the agency last January, the rules require public radio and TV station licensees to report personal data and identify the race, ethnicity and gender of station board members and officers in documents filed with the FCC.

    “There’s no question we will be filing, asking the new FCC to review this order,” said Todd Gray, an attorney representing a coalition of 64 public broadcast licensees — including Ohio State University and the Regents of the University of California — in petitions for reconsideration that the Media Bureau dismissed.

    “The (FCC) staff’s order is cynical and extremely dishonest,” he added, and “clearly intended to go behind the back of what the chairman’s office and bureau perceived” as the commission’s goals under the new administration.

    Many public broadcasters objected to the new regulation’s provision requiring them to provide either the names and full Social Security numbers of each director and officer or their names, addresses, dates of birth and the last four numbers of their Social Security numbers.

    The FCC planned to use the Social Security numbers and other personal information to generate unique identifiers for station board members. These identifiers — not the Social Security numbers or other personal details — would be included in the ownership reports that stations file with the agency every two years.

    The new information would enable the commission to improve the accuracy of its data about how many women and people of color have ownership or other interests in broadcast stations, according to the FCC. Its officials have said they will protect the confidentiality of the personal information. Public broadcasters petitioned the commission to consider how their board members — who serve as volunteers, not for financial compensation — will react to requests to provide their personal data.

    In four formal petitions seeking reconsideration of the new regulations last May, public broadcasters alleged that the FCC had dismissed their concerns that the new rules could make it harder for them to attract and retain board members.

    The four petitions represented dozens of public broadcasting licensees across the U.S., including the State University of New York and the American Public Media. Comments supporting their petitions were filed jointly by America’s Public Television Stations, CPB, NPR and PBS.

    The Media Bureau’s Wednesday decision rejected the petitions on technical grounds.

    “We deny the petitions for reconsideration because they repeat arguments that the commission (has already) fully considered and rejected,” the Media Bureau decision said.

    But in their joint statement issued later that day, Pai and O’Rielly said the FCC’s proposed reporting requirement for public broadcasters “no longer enjoys the support of a majority of the commissioners.”

    “The good news is that today’s decision need not be the final word,” said Pai and O’Rielly in the Wednesday statement, referring to the Media Bureau’s ruling.

    When the commission adopted the new reporting regs in January 2016, all five of the agency’s commissioners — led by the agency’s three Democrats — voted in favor of at least parts of the rules. Pai and O’Rielly both expressed concerns about how the rules would affect public broadcasting, and Pai dissented in part to the rule.

    After Jan. 20 this year, when President-elect Donald Trump’s administration officially begins, Pai and O’Rielly are expected to be in the FCC’s majority.

    “We encourage public broadcasters to file an application for review so that the newly constituted commission will have an opportunity to revisit this matter,” Pai and O’Rielly said. “It is pointless to require board members of [noncommercial educational] stations to report sensitive personal information (like the last four digits of individual Social Security numbers) to the commission and will only serve to discourage these volunteers from serving their communities. This is why public broadcasters from at least two-thirds of the states have sought relief from the commission. We hope that we will be in a position to respond to their call soon.”

    APTS also plans to file for review of the FCC ruling. In a news release, President Patrick Butler said: “The public owns our stations, which operate as licensees of communities, states, universities or school districts. Those who serve on public television station boards are unpaid volunteers. Requiring them to provide sensitive personal information to the Commission is a pointless exercise that advances no identifiable public interest.”

    If the FCC rule is not blocked or modified to exclude public broadcasters, the first station ownership reports to fall under the new reporting requirements would have been due in December

    http://current.org/2017/01/gop-commi...-broadcasters/

  4. #4
    "Many public broadcasters objected to the new regulationís provision requiring them to provide either the names and full Social Security numbers of each director and officer or their names, addresses, dates of birth and the last four numbers of their Social Security numbers."

    That kind of information would open any of those people to massive identity theft. All a hacker needs is Social Security # and DOB to access lots of personal documents from diver's license to tax records to bank statements and credit reports. Not a good idea.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by DJboutit3 View Post
    Here are somethings I could see if Trump does major cuts to FCC funding

    Many new pirate radio station start broadcasting
    A Radio Or TV Station license says 5kw and there transmitter is ratted for 10kw they up the power to max
    AM stations that should powder down or decrease power at night will stay on 24/7
    TV and Radio station might play stuff without being edited
    LPFM stations will run with a lot more power

    With funding take a major hit and FCC field offices closing there will be no one to stop Radio and TV free for all that could be coming.
    Or more likely: Nothing of consequence will change.

    It's not the end of the world.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Solano County, California
    Posts
    4,809
    http://www.adweek.com/tvspy/how-will...tations/187538

    Update some PBS stations are talking about how the CPB cuts affects them directly. If congress cuts the Corporation for Public Broadcasting funds.

    http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/trum...te-1202012308/

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by RadioPatrol View Post

    Update some PBS stations are talking about how the CPB cuts affects them directly. If congress cuts the Corporation for Public Broadcasting funds.
    These are local issues that will affect local voters. People in Congress understand that. That's why they gave up this defund fight four years ago, and why CPB funding has been an automatic. So while it's important for these stations to find outside funding, I have no reason to believe the funding will actually get cut.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Solano County, California
    Posts
    4,809
    http://current.org/2017/03/the-pub-9...-defunded-cpb/

    And an update by Current about if congress really cut funds to CPB.


    So what would actually happen if Republicans in Washington defunded the Corporation for Public Broadcasting?

    “Public television stations are significantly more vulnerable than public radio stations,” said Tom Thomas, co-CEO of the Station Resource Group, a membership organization that, among other things, formulates long-term strategy for public media stations.

    TV stations both rely on federal funding for a higher percentage of their budgets and have greater fixed costs that cannot be trimmed in tight times. In contrast, Thomas told me on The Pub, “It takes a lot to kill a radio station, I’ve got to say. Because we’ve certainly seen examples where it’s been tried!”

    On this week’s show, we try to get the most detailed picture possible of what would actually happen if the Trump administration’s stated goal of totally defunding CPB becomes a reality this year.

    We also consider one argument as to why the CPB should be defunded that has been articulated in recent days by an unlikely source: sitting CPB board member Howard Husock. He comes back to The Pub to discuss his Washington Post op-ed “Public broadcasting shouldn’t get a handout from taxpayers anymore.” (For what it’s worth, Husock didn’t write the headline.)

    Plus, I consult with a Senate procedure expert and a lobbyist for public media organizations who used to be a Hill staffer about how likely it is that the CPB will really get the ax anytime soon.

  9. #9
    Of course this particular thread is about budget cuts to the FCC, which is a very different thing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




     
Our Conferences
Useful Contacts
Community


Contact Us