Who heard this? Good for WSB and a truly strong disagreement between two colleagues?
http://theresurgent.com/erick-responds-to-herman-cain/
http://theresurgent.com/erick-responds-to-herman-cain/
No matter how you feel about Donald Trump--and I am certainly not a supporter of Trump--his campaign has been a boon to talk radio and the cable news networks.
I don't recall a more interesting presidential campaign than this one. The feeling of anticipation and excitement that I have before the latest episode of Scandal or a murder mystery on Investigation Discovery, I now have in the evening for CNN, Fox News Channel and MSNBC. I am more of a music than talk radio listener, but lately I've been tuning in to Limbaugh, Erickson, Hewitt, Levin and others because of this race.
The FCC's elimination of the Fairness Doctrine made today's talk radio possible, and that certainly helped AM stay alive for a number of years. I have been wondering, however, whether talk show hosts should go as far as actively promoting one candidate. For example, Mark Levin has been doing what is in effect a 3-hour commercial for Ted Cruz. Erick Erickson, while not openly endorsing one candidate, urged listeners not to vote for Trump on Super Tuesday. And early on, he said he would welcome any of the Republican candidates on his show except for John Kasich.
I always have looked at talk radio as entertainment. The job of the host is to get ratings, pure and simple. And I happen to find Herman Cain a good listen.
WSB and Donald Trump have something in common: They both DARE you to listen to them. WSB has all this diverse “entertainment” that keeps you listening – or just putting up with it.I saw the man whose commercials make me cringe (even more so than Belinda's), Dave Baker.