O
ok walters
Guest
Webcaster. that is what the music royalty industry calls them
I wish them good luck waiting for that to catch on!ok walters said:Webcaster. that is what the music royalty industry calls them
Salty Dog said:I wish them good luck waiting for that to catch on!ok walters said:Webcaster. that is what the music royalty industry calls them
"What are you listening to Bob? I'm listening to webcasting!"
"Internet Radio" 36 million 400 thousand hits.ProducerGuy said:Salty Dog said:I wish them good luck waiting for that to catch on!ok walters said:Webcaster. that is what the music royalty industry calls them
"What are you listening to Bob? I'm listening to webcasting!"
Or a podcast. Either one. But not "Internet radio".
ProducerGuy said:Salty Dog said:I wish them good luck waiting for that to catch on!ok walters said:Webcaster. that is what the music royalty industry calls them
"What are you listening to Bob? I'm listening to webcasting!"
Or a podcast. Either one. But not "Internet radio".
KeithE4 said:ProducerGuy said:Salty Dog said:I wish them good luck waiting for that to catch on!ok walters said:Webcaster. that is what the music royalty industry calls them
"What are you listening to Bob? I'm listening to webcasting!"
Or a podcast. Either one. But not "Internet radio".
I'll stop calling it "internet radio" as soon as people quit "dialing" their phones.
Salty Dog said:"Internet Radio" 36 million 400 thousand hits.
"Webcasting" 3 million 490 thousand hits. Give it time. It'll catch on.
Fieldtech1 said:Playing devils advocate..... Technically if you stream a webcast on your mobile phone, its coming to you via a tower, transmitter, and radio waves. Does this make it 'radio'?? I could here the sweepers now, "Broadcasting to you via 26000 towers nationwide, its _________.com radio"
We need to sue Jimmy Wales before this misconception gets out of hand. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_radioProducerGuy said:Radio is AM and FM. Not the Internet.
ProducerGuy said:Radio is AM and FM. Not the Internet.
ProducerGuy said:Radio is AM and FM. Not the Internet.
PTBoardOp94 said:ProducerGuy said:Radio is AM and FM. Not the Internet.
And definitely not those satellite impostors.
Maybe for older folks terrestrial radio is still the place to be, but for many under 40 and certainly just about everybody under 20 the "scan button" isn't even a part of their lexicon.musiconradio.com said:This is 2013. Other than the physical medium that delivers the product, they are one and the same and have been for years.
Yes. I love the stories of former morning show hosts, and talent who left broadcast radio and only to return because online is better.
At least for the next few years, the scan button on the car radio will continue to rule.
Most music is still discovered on broadcast radio. Talk and sports too.
One and the same..no. In the future maybe.
The average listener sill enjoys old fashioned radio.
I don't want to take the time to hook up my car charger, connect to my dashboard, and hope I have a connection, and eat up my data plan and don't need a custom playlist every time I crank the engine.
When I can connect to the old WWW.com easily (and that day will come) then I will consider it one and the same.
Broadcast radio will need to adjust to the times. Yes, it will do it kicking and screaming, change (online) will bring new ideas.
All the old dudes (myself included) will give way to new ideas.
KMGX said:Maybe for older folks terrestrial radio is still the place to be, but for many under 40 and certainly just about everybody under 20 the "scan button" isn't even a part of their lexicon.
Walk into a high school or even a college campus and ask how many of the students listen to terrestrial radio (you could call it "regular radio", "the radio" whatever term you like) and watch as most of them either don't even know what that is or tell you "Why would I listen to that? They play the same five songs (and/or) have too many commercials". Radio is neither cool, nor hip to the younger generations and this is a problem this industry hasn't prepared itself to deal with properly.
Talk radio's demographics are aging, same for music stations. The money is getting tighter and the product is getting weaker. Give me some compelling reasons why anyone should/would listen to terrestrial radio these days? Local news? I have a smart phone. Weather? Same as above---smart phone.
As for hearing music first... yeah maybe that was the case 20 years ago, but these days people hear music first on youtube or p2p networks or generally somewhere other than radio. Also, "new" music in a very narrowcast format---which is what most stations are these days---isn't going to appeal to a 25 year old and that's why they go to discover new artists on some other medium (internet radio, satellite, peer-to-peer, youtube, etc).
KeithE4 said:KMGX said:Maybe for older folks terrestrial radio is still the place to be, but for many under 40 and certainly just about everybody under 20 the "scan button" isn't even a part of their lexicon.
Walk into a high school or even a college campus and ask how many of the students listen to terrestrial radio (you could call it "regular radio", "the radio" whatever term you like) and watch as most of them either don't even know what that is or tell you "Why would I listen to that? They play the same five songs (and/or) have too many commercials". Radio is neither cool, nor hip to the younger generations and this is a problem this industry hasn't prepared itself to deal with properly.
Talk radio's demographics are aging, same for music stations. The money is getting tighter and the product is getting weaker. Give me some compelling reasons why anyone should/would listen to terrestrial radio these days? Local news? I have a smart phone. Weather? Same as above---smart phone.
As for hearing music first... yeah maybe that was the case 20 years ago, but these days people hear music first on youtube or p2p networks or generally somewhere other than radio. Also, "new" music in a very narrowcast format---which is what most stations are these days---isn't going to appeal to a 25 year old and that's why they go to discover new artists on some other medium (internet radio, satellite, peer-to-peer, youtube, etc).
What makes you think that it's just kids that are doing that? Us geezers, who radio doesn't care about, are doing the same thing. Terrestrial radio abandoned the baby-boom generation years ago. If I want to listen to jazz, blues, classic rock other than the same 100 songs over and over again, classic country, and other Sacred Sales Demo-unfriendly formats, I have to go online.
As far as I'm concerned, radio is for local sports and little else. And I'm no kid.
KeithE4 said:Us geezers, who radio doesn't care about, are doing the same thing. Terrestrial radio abandoned the baby-boom generation years ago.
PTBoardOp94 said:ProducerGuy said:Radio is AM and FM. Not the Internet.
And definitely not those satellite impostors.