Thanks for an insightful assessment, Flip.
> Damn KMR,you're funny too. Such selective memory.
>
> Glenn is only one of two people on this board who correctly
> called the Dees situation, and if memory serves, was pretty
> accurate about the Arrow situation as well.
IIRC, Glenn posted two rumors about KCBS and one about Dees before the ones that played out, and the previous rumors didn't (obviously) play out. (Which you acknowledge in your next paragraph, Flip; which one of us has the selective mmeory now?)
> I've mentioned before that you should let this one play out
> and then hold him accountable for any and all bad
> predictions. To be fair, Glenn has had some of those too,
> but this is radio, I don't know anyone who gets it right all
> the time. And you've been in this business long enough to
> know that rumors of this type are a staple of the radio
> business. The idea that you think you can moderate an
> interesting and relevant radio board without rumor and
> innuendo is just as funny as the selective memory.
My problem with Glenn (and the reason he's been banned so many times by the owners) is that he spins the rumor as if it was absolute certainty. That comes off as arrogant at best, especially since he hasn't always been right. As you say, no one does, but Glenn posts as if he's infallible.
You're right on the money with your next-to-last statement. It just irritates me (and others, judging from my e-mail) when they are played as "this is absolutely going to happen". And that happens so much around here that I have a really short fuse now.
Innuendo, on the other hand, borders on slander and libel, so I really can't let that happen. The owners really do expect moderators to clamp down on that.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>