• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Well-known radio advertiser settles in false advertising lawsuit

They also had a Public Affairs department but these things existed to comply with FCC rules, something about "serving the public interest as a public trustee." How quaint.

However the public affairs departments had no oversight of advertising. And those departments mostly went away when the FCC did away with community ascertainment requirements during one of their deregulation binges.
 
So file a complaint with the FTC and if they think it's worth investigating, they will.
If it doesn’t occur to people that gold peddlers say
That is a reference to laws and regulations outside the FCC jurisdiction and which the FCC neither monitors nor enforces:

"Stations are restricted from broadcasting material that promotes certain lotteries; advertises cigarettes,
little cigars or smokeless tobacco products; or perpetuates a fraud. Some advertisements also may
violate regulations that fall under the jurisdiction of other federal agencies, such as the Food and Drug
Administration or the Federal Trade Commission"


The case of lotteries, tobacco are extensions of Federal laws. Please cite one instance where the FCC has fined, sanctioned or penalized a station for broadcasting such ads.
That is a reference to laws and regulations outside the FCC jurisdiction and which the FCC neither monitors nor enforces:

"Stations are restricted from broadcasting material that promotes certain lotteries; advertises cigarettes,
little cigars or smokeless tobacco products; or perpetuates a fraud. Some advertisements also may
violate regulations that fall under the jurisdiction of other federal agencies, such as the Food and Drug
Administration or the Federal Trade Commission"


The case of lotteries, tobacco are extensions of Federal laws. Please cite one instance where the FCC has fined, sanctioned or penalized a station for broadcasting such ads.
Looking at the FTC site, the only people they prosecute are those who promise gold, take money from listeners, and then fail to deliver the gold they promised. There have been several of those people. But if this says he trusts them, that's his free speech right. Perhaps he does trust them, but it's not required. There are scams out there. People need to do their due diligence. They can't rely on the government or radio to do it for them.
Some media used to consider their obligation to screen incoming spots for fraudulent statements. I've worked for radio stations that had a "Standards and Practices" department to help keep the station clean,
Martin Gilbert needs to look at the definition of "puffery", which is acceptable and legal.
Talk show hosts urging listeners to buy gold, especially without disclaimers that they are not registered investment advisors, is unacceptable and flirts with illegality. SEC.gov | Laws and Rules
 
No such disclaimer has been made by this particular talk show host, nor by others ”advising” their listeners to buy gold from their gold sponsors who are “the only gold company I trust.”
Are you certain the host in question wasn't doing a live read commercial? I've heard many such commercials over the years. I think they're as old as commercial radio itself.

As for supplements, it's always caveat emptor. Even prescriptions have their issues, hence all the lawsuits when a prescription product goes awry. I personally use some supplements, but I always investigate them beforehand. The FDA also has the Supplement Facts label on supplements for a reason, as well as disclaimers required on every bottle or box -- at least by law.

I probably have heard at least one or two of the supplement ads in the OP, and I think 'puffery' is probably the most appropriate description for many of their radio claims, as well as many other unrelated radio commercial claims.

In the case of the product mentioned in the OP, you can't replace ten pounds of vegetables with one or two capsules. But then again, to get your daily FDA requirement of some vitamins and minerals, you'd have to eat a wheelbarrow of certain foods a day. There is no magic panacea. You just do the best you can.
 
Update: Federal court orders Balance of Nature to stop selling its products

This part of the CBS News article caught my attention:

"Balance of Nature has also drawn scrutiny for years from outside groups.

The nonprofit Truth in Advertising filed complaints in 2020 against Balance of Nature with the FTC and FDA, citing claims made across a number of talk radio shows including "The Joe Piscopo Show," "Kevin McCullough Radio" and "America First with Sebastian Gorka" episodes."


All of these shows air on Salem's WMCA and WNYM in the New York market. And in full disclosure, Salem also happens to be my employer.

Without being too critical, integrity has become passe when it comes to properly vetting potential advertisers on both the local and national levels. All that matters is that the check clears, and that the salesperson keeps their clients happy and gets their commission. Truth is, without these bottom-feeders and their cash, the stations would have challenges meeting their bottom lines. So, it's pretty much a "damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't" scenario.

IIRC, MyPillow got into trouble a few years ago for making false claims that its products cure ailments associated with sleeping, and they had to make adjustments in their advertising. We'll see if "Balance of Nature" takes the same road. And there was a time when I would hear their infomercials play as many as four times every Saturday or Sunday, but must have cut back on their radio spending.

IMO, the supplement companies are the worst offenders. "Relief Factor", "Ruff Greens" and the ubiquitous "Dinovite" have to be next on the FDA and FTC's collective (s)hit list.
 
Last edited:
Without being too critical, integrity has become passe when it comes to properly vetting potential advertisers on both the local and national levels.

The other side of that is the programming on those stations has chased away both credible advertisers and sellable demographics, leaving the only potential sponsors to be drug, medical, financial, and insurance companies. It's starting to happen on social media sites that attract controversial commentary. It's very unlikely you're going to hear that kind of advertising on music stations that target younger demos.
 
The only time I've ever known any station to scrutinize spots for their content before they ran was at KPRS, and I think a big part of the reason they can do that is because they're independently owned. They choose/chose not to run any spots they felt were racist, and they only refused one spot while I was there. I don't remember what company it was for and I didn't hear it when it was being reviewed, but the production director told me about it.
 
This part of the CBS News article caught my attention:

"Balance of Nature has also drawn scrutiny for years from outside groups.

The nonprofit Truth in Advertising filed complaints in 2020 against Balance of Nature with the FTC and FDA, citing claims made across a number of talk radio shows including "The Joe Piscopo Show," "Kevin McCullough Radio" and "America First with Sebastian Gorka" episodes."


All of these shows air on Salem's WMCA and WNYM in the New York market. And in full disclosure, Salem also happens to be my employer.

IMO, the supplement companies are the worst offenders. "Relief Factor", "Ruff Greens" and the ubiquitous "Dinovite" have to be next on the FDA and FTC's collective (s)hit list.
At the same time, these are radio people who are running the ads, not nutrient or nutrition experts.

Unless a radio station, or radio company hires a lab to actually test every consumable product they allow to advertise on their stations, there is no way for them to know whether the product is effective or not, or can live up to the statements made in the advertisements. Not every radio company has a lab handy to check out all consumable products before they decide to run the ads.

And, stations obviously need the advertising money.
 
This part of the CBS News article caught my attention:

"Balance of Nature has also drawn scrutiny for years from outside groups.

The nonprofit Truth in Advertising filed complaints in 2020 against Balance of Nature with the FTC and FDA, citing claims made across a number of talk radio shows including "The Joe Piscopo Show," "Kevin McCullough Radio" and "America First with Sebastian Gorka" episodes."


All of these shows air on Salem's WMCA and WNYM in the New York market. And in full disclosure, Salem also happens to be my employer.

Without being too critical, integrity has become passe when it comes to properly vetting potential advertisers on both the local and national levels. All that matters is that the check clears, and that the salesperson keeps their clients happy and gets their commission. Truth is, without these bottom-feeders and their cash, the stations would have challenges meeting their bottom lines. So, it's pretty much a "damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't" scenario.

IIRC, MyPillow got into trouble a few years ago for making false claims that its products cure ailments associated with sleeping, and they had to make adjustments in their advertising. We'll see if "Balance of Nature" takes the same road. And there was a time when I would hear their infomercials play as many as four times every Saturday or Sunday, but must have cut back on their radio spending.

IMO, the supplement companies are the worst offenders. "Relief Factor", "Ruff Greens" and the ubiquitous "Dinovite" have to be next on the FDA and FTC's collective (s)hit list.
My Pillow lost its BBB accreditation as a consequence of misleading perpetual sales. To the extent that Relief Factor is effective in relieving pain, the key ingredient would be the turmeric. The other ingredients, such as fish oil and resveratrol, likely offer no benefits.
 
However the public affairs departments had no oversight of advertising. And those departments mostly went away when the FCC did away with community ascertainment requirements during one of their deregulation binges.
And few stations actually had a "Public Affairs Department". I don't personally know of a single one.

PA was a joint responsibility of the Program Director and General Manager and, if the station had one, the News Director. Generally it meant making sure that the programming in the areas that were promised in the license or license renewal applications were being fulfilled. That meant total hours of news, public affairs, educational and other.

Of course, all the department heads would be called on to help with "Community Leader Ascertainment" in the pre-license renewal period.

As you say, all things of the past... when a license renewal, complete with detailed ascertainment, composite week logs and other support documents could fill a 20 pound box. And if co-prepared with FCC counsel, could cost $3,000 or more.
 
Just saw a whole new series of Balance of Nature spots on TV.

I guess they got approval from someone.
They were not told to stop´selling the product, just to stop making those absurd claims. So they did new ads and ordered time to run them. They may have run the copy by their attorneys, but they would not have needed other approval..
 
And few stations actually had a "Public Affairs Department". I don't personally know of a single one.

PA was a joint responsibility of the Program Director and General Manager and, if the station had one, the News Director. Generally it meant making sure that the programming in the areas that were promised in the license or license renewal applications were being fulfilled. That meant total hours of news, public affairs, educational and other.

Of course, all the department heads would be called on to help with "Community Leader Ascertainment" in the pre-license renewal period.

As you say, all things of the past... when a license renewal, complete with detailed ascertainment, composite week logs and other support documents could fill a 20 pound box. And if co-prepared with FCC counsel, could cost $3,000 or more.

We regularly exceede anything that mightve ever been required of public files/public service programming/public affairs department/community asscertainment, etc and still far exceede it even though we dont need to maintain an online or paper public file anymore
 
The subject of a talk radio host selling gold to listeners came up in this thread. There is a case before the Supreme Court that would challenge whether the government can interfere or regulate the financial claims made on the radio. The case was brought by a conservative talk show host:


The goal is to cut back on the role of government as a safety net or protection against fraud on the radio.

George Jarkesy, the case’s namesake, is a right-wing radio host and former hedge-fund manager. The SEC charged him in 2013 with violating federal securities laws. According to the agency, Jarkesy lied to investors about who was running a pair of funds he founded, what they were investing in, whether they worked with prominent auditors and brokers, and so on. He also allegedly inflated asset values to charge higher management fees.
 
The goal is to cut back on the role of government as a safety net or protection against fraud on the radio.
Not just radio...
 
So the spice helps loosen and unblock it, and the fiber helps push it through and "pass" it?

I just read the ingredients... i take fiber powder every day.. get it from walmart, target, etc.

This looks to be nothing more then regular fiber with exotic flavoring with some "health add ons" that are only slightly more than a placebo
 
Back
Top Bottom