Um Wrong. 1590 moved their night operation to the current Bainbridge site in 1963-64. Any one moving to the neighborhood after that date knew what they were moving next to. Just like the people on the Big Island who built where fissures opened up or bought houses there. I bet half the interference complaints are Interlopers that moved in after the 1590 site was built. And Salem is not changing the use of the property, Not adding a tower. Just a little digging to install transmission lines. Salem will need an electrical permit. The site has always been there since 1964. Salem is just adding another tenant to the existing transmission site. With a few exceptions not to different from an owner of a tower renting to a two way company that installs an antenna on an existing tower.
I'm wrong that adding a new station, let alone something proposed to be 50kW to an existing site isn't considered new? Really??
You're right about one thing; the old 1590 site was built in the 60's, but would, and will never support adding a diplexed 50kW station as-is. 1590 is a hunk of junk, never built right nor properly maintained for over 50 years. To a neighbor, the new 50kW station will be the interloper, considering 1590 barely has any field strength past the cow pasture it was built on anyway. Rebuilding that site to actually radiate? It's going to require a lot of capital.
I don't think the NIMBY's can stop the addition of the third stations transmitter. The only thing they may get is new cordless phone.
As Archie mentioned in their reply, just look at the years of NIMBY battles Andy went through moving and upgrading KRKO. That was dealing with residents less well-off than Bainbridge Island residents, and this all happened many years ago. Things have changed even more. The FCC has lost most of their people used to dealing with RFI complaints. All it will take is one Bainbridge resident to write their member of Congress, and the Commission will stall any issuance of a CP until AM, and we're all dead.
But to make the FCC happy so the FCC will actually issue the license once constructed. The FCC may ask the licensee (Salem) to fix the RFI issues brought up after the new transmitter/station (1300) is turned on. Yes a pain, but doable.
Of course it's doable, I've done it many times. The rules of engagement have changed though, especially when it comes to squeaky wheel NIMBY's. Politics overrule the rules. A moved, or new facility already has to mitigate RFI for one year after the license is issued anyway. The Commission has been known to extend that deadline. Cordless phones are the least of the problem. When the NIMBY's start making claims that their Internet is slower, or a business has RFI into their fire alarm system and doesn't want you touching it, that's when all sorts of life-safety effects from your new station come into play. That's when lawyers get involved.
Salem is also swapping with Intelli LLC, who will be the new Licensee of 1300. There may be language in the details that Salem needs to build the new site and deliver an operating radio station before the swap is complete. Which would put Salem on the hook to fix RFI issues in the neighborhood and get the license issued for the construction permit for the 1300 operation.
My original point stands: Any company who tries to build a new 50kW AM site near industrial, or up-scale residential areas, should have their collective heads examined. Salem goofed with trying to build 1300 near the Port of Tacoma. They will be making a similar mistake in trying to build one on Bainbridge.