Now back to topic. Should the FCC allow small AM's to keep their FM translators on if they go silent on AM?
No regulatory fees will be paid at all if the AM's go away.Your proposal is not just to go silent, but to shut the AM down and sell the tower land. No upside for the FCC there.
No regulatory fees will be paid at all if the AM's go away.
Why not make them pay the same as before to keep the FM?How do they keep paying fees if they shut down their AM?
Why not make them pay the same as before to keep the FM?
But the translators have moved all the listeners and money to FM.The FCC is not strictly in the fee collection business. They need AMs to stay on the air.
But the translators have moved all the listeners and money to FM.
Not much of a public resource if there's no money, no listeners, and nobody left to do it.The FCC is a regulatory agency. They're not going to authorize the shut-down of a federal resource by themselves.
Not much of a public resource if there's no money, no listeners, and nobody left to do it.
My car has AM. It's been a long time since I went there.
AM was great when I was young. That was a long time ago.Is there anything I've said that's not true? The NAB is spending member money convincing congress how great AM is.
AM was great when I was young. That was a long time ago.
FM will outlive AM by ten years. It's just a band aid.There are a lot of people who feel the same way about FM. That's not going to help your case.
from the looks of the pictures I wonder if the AM was working before the tower was stolen.
I think there is more going on than what we are being told.
My daughter worked at a thrift shop a few years ago. She said you wouldn't believe how many radios they took in every week.Nobody. Is. Buying. Radios. Anymore. The government would have to strong-arm manufacturers into producing any radios with the new band for the American market, then bribe retailers into stocking them.