I just checked pollstar.com and it looks like The Warfield entertainment venue is no longer managed by CC, I believe the naming rights were sold and now it's called the SF weekly warfield, how lame ass is that, first it's mcafee coliseum, then monster "cable" park, sbc park which is pretty cool, hp pavilion, but SF WEEKLY warfield??? it just does not fit very well, but I guess if you got the money to waste, then whatever!!!! companies and their advertising budgets never amaze me.
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
SF Weekly Warfield????
- Thread starter only1deejayman
- Start date
WARFIELD? hahaha...thats a new one. I love it actually.
> I just checked pollstar.com and it looks like The Warfield
> entertainment venue is no longer managed by CC, I believe
> the naming rights were sold and now it's called the SF
> weekly warfield, how lame ass is that, first it's mcafee
> coliseum, then monster "cable" park, sbc park which is
> pretty cool, hp pavilion, but SF WEEKLY warfield??? it just
> does not fit very well, but I guess if you got the money to
> waste, then whatever!!!! companies and their advertising
> budgets never amaze me.
>
<P ID="signature">______________
-TheGuy...InTheRadio</P>
> I just checked pollstar.com and it looks like The Warfield
> entertainment venue is no longer managed by CC, I believe
> the naming rights were sold and now it's called the SF
> weekly warfield, how lame ass is that, first it's mcafee
> coliseum, then monster "cable" park, sbc park which is
> pretty cool, hp pavilion, but SF WEEKLY warfield??? it just
> does not fit very well, but I guess if you got the money to
> waste, then whatever!!!! companies and their advertising
> budgets never amaze me.
>
<P ID="signature">______________
-TheGuy...InTheRadio</P>
Actually this happened about a month ago. Needless to say the SF Bay Guardian has been merciless in its criticism. Bet they become more selective about what shows to review too.
> WARFIELD? hahaha...thats a new one. I love it actually.
>
>
> > I just checked pollstar.com and it looks like The Warfield
>
> > entertainment venue is no longer managed by CC, I believe
> > the naming rights were sold and now it's called the SF
> > weekly warfield, how lame ass is that, first it's mcafee
> > coliseum, then monster "cable" park, sbc park which is
> > pretty cool, hp pavilion, but SF WEEKLY warfield??? it
> just
> > does not fit very well, but I guess if you got the money
> to
> > waste, then whatever!!!! companies and their advertising
> > budgets never amaze me.
> >
>
> WARFIELD? hahaha...thats a new one. I love it actually.
>
>
> > I just checked pollstar.com and it looks like The Warfield
>
> > entertainment venue is no longer managed by CC, I believe
> > the naming rights were sold and now it's called the SF
> > weekly warfield, how lame ass is that, first it's mcafee
> > coliseum, then monster "cable" park, sbc park which is
> > pretty cool, hp pavilion, but SF WEEKLY warfield??? it
> just
> > does not fit very well, but I guess if you got the money
> to
> > waste, then whatever!!!! companies and their advertising
> > budgets never amaze me.
> >
>
> Actually this happened about a month ago. Needless to say
> the SF Bay Guardian has been merciless in its criticism.
> Bet they become more selective about what shows to review
> too.
Actually, Clear Channel still manages the Warfield... it was they that cut the deal with SF Weekly and renamed it. Now CC advertises its concerts exclusively w/SF Weekly and their partner publications (nowhere else) and in return for the exclusive arrangement, take a fee from SF Weekly. Isn't monopoly a beautiful thing?
> the SF Bay Guardian has been merciless in its criticism.
> Bet they become more selective about what shows to review
> too.
Actually, Clear Channel still manages the Warfield... it was they that cut the deal with SF Weekly and renamed it. Now CC advertises its concerts exclusively w/SF Weekly and their partner publications (nowhere else) and in return for the exclusive arrangement, take a fee from SF Weekly. Isn't monopoly a beautiful thing?
- Status