• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Looking for advice on licensing and operating an LPFM station in Monmouth County, New Jersey

At this time, no. Will say the offset was more then 400 feet
This is a cut throat business especially as frequencies become scarce. Out to much information and some attorney or consultant will be phoning around your town or neighborhood looking to drum himself up a client. This happens very very often.
 
Yep - hence my being somewhat vauge....

Well, not a problem. but at least you did admit the location was possibly within a ten mile radius of Monmouth Reform Temple.

But in the interests of topic drift, Google Earth's LAT/LON seems to vary in accuracy (or preciseness?), perhaps depending on location.

Using the FCC data for the WABC (770 kHz) main location, Google Earth shows that LAT/LON point within maybe 15 feet of the tower base. Another FCC set of data points for an AM/FM operation in Georgia, the Google Earth LAT/LON displayis about 230 feet or so from the tower base.

I just checked my present location with my Garmin GPS and the GPS LAT/LON is about 10 feet from the Google Earth LAT/LON map location.

Obviously, Google Earth's LAT/LON appears to vary.
 
Using the FCC data for the WABC (770 kHz) main location, Google Earth shows that LAT/LON point within maybe 15 feet of the tower base. Another FCC set of data points for an AM/FM operation in Georgia, the Google Earth LAT/LON displayis about 230 feet or so from the tower base.
Many AM stations were authorized before there was even a computerized system (BAPS, c. 1978) used to track broadcast applications and facilities internally within the FCC. Everything was done on paper and was tracked on index cards kept in a card catalog similar to those they used to have in libraries. In those days, there was no GPS. Coordinates had to be determined using surveyors and topographic maps and many of these facilities, the coordinates were rounded to the nearest second. Doing the REC History Project where we have made "electronic" versions of old history cards of some AM and FM stations in top markets, we have found that the coordinates (even after being converted from NAD27 to NAD83) were still somewhat off of where the tower site actually is. I believe that the FCC is well aware of and is tolerant of these discrepancies.

In most broadcast services, the FCC allows for a tolerance of 3 seconds of latitude or longitude where it comes to the placement (or moving) of a tower site. The exception is LPFM. §73.871 states that any change in coordinates will require a construction permit (there is no "three second rule"). This has been used in the past against LPFM stations, especially those that were also in trouble for other reasons as a basis for unauthorized operation, thus allowing the Commission to consider the station "as good as silent" to justify a license or permit cancellation ) see Chinese Voice of Golden City, Notification of License Expiration and Deletion of Call Letters, Facility ID No. 194198, Letter (MB Nov. 19, 2019; recon. denied Jan. 15, 2020, 35 FCC Rcd. 567; see also 35 FCC Rcd. 13638 (2020) citing see Eagle Broad. Group, Ltd., 563 F.3rd 543,553 (D.C. Cir. 2009)). (In that case, the authorized coordinates of the LPFM station were off by 256 feet.) This case went to the DC Circuit. For a document collection see: https://recnet.com/kqls
 
Victoria McCauley is a lawyer at the FCC. I have spoken with her many times. She is a decent person and she is fair. She did not revoke a minority controlled LPFM because they made a mistake in coordinates that were half a city clock off.

Instead it was determined the LPFM had used another site, a rooftop antenna two miles from it's licensed site without FCC permission.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.
Back
Top Bottom