M
mrradioguy99
Guest
Re: KFRC PD GONE!To Be A Jack Station 9-01
> GB - Now THAT is interesting and exciting speculation - I
> hope you're right. And if 106.9's signal is weaker than
> 99.7, I can see Infinity swapping formats and making it "Hot
> 99.7." I've got to disagree though with the comment that
> most KFRC listeners are on "fixed incomes." The Baby Boom
> years are considered to be 1945-1960. That means that the
> oldest Boomers are 60, and the youngest are 45. Most of us
> are still working. I'm 53, both my wife and I still work,
> and we have more combined household income than ever before.
> With a dozen years left on my mortgage and kids in college,
> I doubt I'll be able to retire until 2017 or so.
>
> "Randy in Eugene" made a good point about advertisers not
> paying attention to older consumers, and advertising on
> lower rated stations with a younger audience. That explains
> how K-101/Star 101.3 can soldier on forever with the same
> basic format and be a top biller despite usually mediocre
> ratings.
This is the same debate that is going on in NYC where oldies on WCBS was replaced by JACK. The old WCBS was a top 10 biller in New York.
Despite the fact that 45 year olds have a lot more disposable income than 23 year olds, advertising agencies have come to the conclusion that they can make an impact on what the 23 year old buys, while the 45 year old is going to go more on what he has bought before. I am not saying that is my opinion, just what the advertising agencies go by.
> GB - Now THAT is interesting and exciting speculation - I
> hope you're right. And if 106.9's signal is weaker than
> 99.7, I can see Infinity swapping formats and making it "Hot
> 99.7." I've got to disagree though with the comment that
> most KFRC listeners are on "fixed incomes." The Baby Boom
> years are considered to be 1945-1960. That means that the
> oldest Boomers are 60, and the youngest are 45. Most of us
> are still working. I'm 53, both my wife and I still work,
> and we have more combined household income than ever before.
> With a dozen years left on my mortgage and kids in college,
> I doubt I'll be able to retire until 2017 or so.
>
> "Randy in Eugene" made a good point about advertisers not
> paying attention to older consumers, and advertising on
> lower rated stations with a younger audience. That explains
> how K-101/Star 101.3 can soldier on forever with the same
> basic format and be a top biller despite usually mediocre
> ratings.
This is the same debate that is going on in NYC where oldies on WCBS was replaced by JACK. The old WCBS was a top 10 biller in New York.
Despite the fact that 45 year olds have a lot more disposable income than 23 year olds, advertising agencies have come to the conclusion that they can make an impact on what the 23 year old buys, while the 45 year old is going to go more on what he has bought before. I am not saying that is my opinion, just what the advertising agencies go by.