I would love to hear the clip but from clicking the link to read the story, I feel like it is a real stretch to say the guest advocated violence. I got the impression that if Trump overstepped, he felt congress would not act and it would be up to the people to act. That is assuming lots of things: if Trump oversteps, if congress won't act. Neither event happened. For someone to reach that conclusion would make me strongly urge they not to listen to The Beatles song Helter Skelter, especially backwards!
It really has nothing to do with what side of the political fence one is on. If you simply read the article, you really have to pile on to come to the conclusion violence was advocated. Watching a horror film with a friend years ago, the friend asked if I ever thought about the writer of the movie? For them to write it, are they thinking like the doer of such evil deeds? In other words, if you think this way, does that mean you are much like the person that took action, except that you never followed through with action? And the fact you'd think that way, is that something that should scare you about your capabilities? Maybe it makes you a person who simply has a deeper understanding of people and how their minds work.
