• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

8200 or 8300?

Studio1

Inactive
Inactive User
If someone walked into your office and put two Optimods on the table, an 8200 and an 8300, and said you could take
one or the other but not both, which one would you take and why?
 
8300 without a doubt.
Why? It's of a later generation and soundwise a large step better than the 8200.
Not enough? 8300 has built-in 222A, 8200 doesn't
Not enough? 8300 has network connectivity, 8200 doesn't
Not enough? Replacementparts for the 8200 are starting to be hard(er) to get.
 
chriscollins said:
The 8300 is a great processor. I have that and a 5500... Even though the 5500 is 'newer', the 8300 is superior.

Is it safe to say the 5500 is really just a reboxing/update to the 8200? Or kind of a step between an 8200 and an 8400?
 
whitfm said:
chriscollins said:
The 8300 is a great processor. I have that and a 5500... Even though the 5500 is 'newer', the 8300 is superior.

Is it safe to say the 5500 is really just a reboxing/update to the 8200? Or kind of a step between an 8200 and an 8400?

The 5500 is light years ahead of an 8200. It is not quite as good as the 8300 was... I think the 8300 gives me almost 1 db loudness for the same distortion.

I highly recommend the 5500. It is a wonderful budget processor and even lets you do SSB if you want.
 
8300. The 8200 is 20 years old now. Spare parts are becoming harder to find, and if I remember right, the stereo generator is of an analog design as are the lowpass filters in it.

Plus the 8300 can be put on a LAN, so you can adjust it from anywhere with the remote control software.
 
Do I have to pay for the 8200 and the 8300? Because if I do, I'll roll my money into a modern processor.

Otherwise, 8300 hands down.
 
We are running a 8300 on one of our small market stations in the shadow of a larger metro. I can keep up with the "big boys" just fine with the 8300. Only those with 8600s and Omnia 9s and 11s can beat me. :) That 8600 is nothing short of breath-taking. I can certainly identify which stations are running them around here. The ones that are running 6s sound sick compared to the ultra-modern 8600.
 
OKCRadioGuy said:
We are running a 8300 on one of our small market stations in the shadow of a larger metro. I can keep up with the "big boys" just fine with the 8300. Only those with 8600s and Omnia 9s and 11s can beat me. :) That 8600 is nothing short of breath-taking. I can certainly identify which stations are running them around here. The ones that are running 6s sound sick compared to the ultra-modern 8600.

Must be how those Omnias are adjusted. The stations running 8600s here sound sick compared to the ones running Omnia 6s and absolutely dismal compared to the ones running Omnia 11s.
 
Must be how the 8600's are adjusted.One here is killing the old old 6. not even a race! the 11 is thousands more than the 8600,it should sound better perhaps.
 
Talking about "audio processing" always reminds me of the Democrats and Republicans in Washington.

Yes, Virginia...audio processing is truly subjective.

:D
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.
Back
Top Bottom