That's not what I asked. Dan, as I've said, the issue is transparency.
Personal story. About a year ago, I had a concern about an issue with K-Love. I directed an e-mail to Mike Novak. Within a half hour, I received a return e-mail personally from Mr. Novak. He asked for a phone number. Two hours later I was speaking directly with him by telephone. He was candid and directly addressed my concern. About a week later, I received a follow-up letter from Mr. Novak, wanting to ensure that my concerns had been answered and thanking me for the opportunity to address the issue.
Contrast that with this situation. Unlike Mr. Novak, it appears to me that you're unwilling to publicly offer your side to the recent public concerns expressed about your operations. Traditionally when pressed, you choose to either not respond, or as in this example, offer a reply that doesn't answer the question asked. It's troubling to see. Mr. Novak went far out of his way to offer an answer to my e-mail. Respect is earned and he more than earned mine that day.