• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The EU Wants Video Services Like YouTube to Police Content for Hate Speech

http://fortune.com/2017/04/25/eu-lawmakers-youtube-fight-online-hate-speech/

https://www.mediapost.com/publicati...utube-boycott-is-a-good-thing-for-creato.html

Here are some updates on the Youtube fiasco. Well some Youtube shows can get around the boycott rules by having their viewers donate to them via Patreon. But at the same time "hate speech" and "fake news" have been seen as the root causes for the pull-out by the advertisers. Well the EU can say they will crack down on fake news however Youtube has to defend "free Speech" at the same time though. Google's video platform has to walk the tight rope here.

https://www.patreon.com/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patreon

Video-sharing platforms such as Google's YouTube and Vimeo will have to take measures to protect citizens from content containing hate speech and incitement to violence under measures voted by EU lawmakers on Tuesday.
The proliferation of hate speech and fake news on social media has led to companies coming under increased pressure to take it down quickly, while Internet campaigners have warned an excessive crackdown could endanger freedom of speech.
Members of the culture committee in the European Parliament voted on a legislative proposal that covers everything from 30% quotas for European works on video streaming websites such as Netflix to advertising times on TV to combating hate speech.
The lawmakers approved an amendment that would define video-sharing platforms as services or a "dissociable section of a wider service" that "play a significant role in providing programmes and user-generated videos to the general public, in order to inform, entertain or educate," which could include social media networks including Facebook and Twitter that also carry videos.
"Social media should not be regulated through the back door. Tackling hate speech on social media is important, but the CULT (culture) committee should not jump the gun by adopting a far-reaching definition of video sharing platforms without any proper impact assessment," said Marietje Schaake, a member of the Liberals group of the parliament.
While the proposal voted by the parliament will need to be discussed and eventually agreed with EU member states in the Council of the EU, the latter has also extended the scope of the law to cover social media companies.
Video-sharing platforms will have to take "appropriate, proportionate and efficient measures" to protect all citizens from content containing incitement to undermine human dignity or incitement to violence or hatred.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.
Back
Top Bottom