WUSF beating WFLZ in the latest public August 6+ ratings...
Am I reading this right?
WUSF 5.1
WFLZ 4.8
Overall 6+ numbers mean nothing.
WUSF had a good book with TSL due to the political season, but if you look at the Cume WFLZ has almost triple the amount, that is where it counts.
I am sure when you actually break the numbers down WFLZ blows them away int he demographics that really count, which are 18-34 and 25-54.
Furthermore, in the commercial world, a Non-Commercial Station is non-existent as it has zero effect.
Overall 6+ numbers mean nothing.
WUSF had a good book with TSL due to the political season, but if you look at the Cume WFLZ has almost triple the amount, that is where it counts.
I am sure when you actually break the numbers down WFLZ blows them away int he demographics that really count, which are 18-34 and 25-54.
Furthermore, in the commercial world, a Non-Commercial Station is non-existent as it has zero effect.
So you're saying that WDUV being #1 in this market for so long means nothing?
And you're saying that if there is a non-commercial CHR station in the market (which there is), it has no effect on WFLZ or even WPOI?
The non-com CHR I'm talking about is the one adjacent to the 100.1 LPFM Hispanic station that iHeart obviously had a problem with a while ago.
I'm pretty sure WFLZ & iHeart is already well aware of this one.
WYPW Power 100 (99.9FM) in Brandon:
David perhaps you can share your expertise on this. How is a Non Commercial LPFM such as WYPW allowed to sound like a commercial station with a current music log, imaging, air talent (not serving as educational but entertainment) and spots. I thought the point of LPFM's was to have an education and community requirement. It seems in many markets both LPFM's and Non Com stations below 92 on the dial are getting away with sounding like straight ahead commercial stations complete with paid talent and a Sales Staff. In that case are these stations really making that much to cover costs of keeping the stations on the air and pay staffs? The big companies even have a hard time doing this.
There is no control of content on non-commercial or LPFM stations. They can sound just like commercial stations, and they can solicit advertisers with the only restriction that the "ads" conform to the rules of underwriting.
There were some famous and very successful "commercial sounding" non-coms, with an example being WBRU in Providence which has been a rock station... and a good one... since the 60's. http://www.wbru.com/
Non-commercial stations and LPFMs are not required to be educational, just non-commercial. They can be classical, jazz, rock (look at Fordham's very good station in NYC) or talk and information. They can be bluegrass, top 40, oldies (look at the LPFM true oldies station in LA County's high desert) or Americana. They can be regional Mexican (KNAI, the UFW station in Phoenix is an example) or Contemporary Christian.
And serving the community can take many forms. Playing a good contemporary music mix is just as much a service as playing classical music. "Community service" is not limited to talk and discussion shows about local issues.
David perhaps you can share your expertise on this. How is a Non Commercial LPFM such as WYPW allowed to sound like a commercial station with a current music log, imaging, air talent (not serving as educational but entertainment) and spots. I thought the point of LPFM's was to have an education and community requirement. It seems in many markets both LPFM's and Non Com stations below 92 on the dial are getting away with sounding like straight ahead commercial stations complete with paid talent and a Sales Staff. In that case are these stations really making that much to cover costs of keeping the stations on the air and pay staffs? The big companies even have a hard time doing this.
And serving the community can take many forms. Playing a good contemporary music mix is just as much a service as playing classical music. "Community service" is not limited to talk and discussion shows about local issues.