Haven't they learned their lesson from authorizing nighttime IBOC? Buried in the FCC's "AM Revitalization Plan" is the proposal to eliminate nighttime skywave coverage protection for Class A stations, allowing the former "clear channels" to be further clogged up with useless low-power nighttime signals:
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-releases-am-revitalization-first-report-and-order-fnprm-noi
They also glibly dismissed commenters' proposals to allow Class A stations to increase their power to 100 kW.
Nighttime skywave reception is AM's last remaining technical advantage over FM or TV, and remains useful in rural areas with no local radio stations and in the event of natural disasters such as Superstorm Sandy when local broadcast stations and Internet/cell phone communications are wiped out. Therefore it should be preserved, rather than abolished for the short-sighted gains of some stations that would be better served by adding FM translators rather than boosting their nighttime AM signals in the hopes of drowning out the 50,000-watt gorilla sharing their channel.
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-releases-am-revitalization-first-report-and-order-fnprm-noi
They also glibly dismissed commenters' proposals to allow Class A stations to increase their power to 100 kW.
Nighttime skywave reception is AM's last remaining technical advantage over FM or TV, and remains useful in rural areas with no local radio stations and in the event of natural disasters such as Superstorm Sandy when local broadcast stations and Internet/cell phone communications are wiped out. Therefore it should be preserved, rather than abolished for the short-sighted gains of some stations that would be better served by adding FM translators rather than boosting their nighttime AM signals in the hopes of drowning out the 50,000-watt gorilla sharing their channel.
Last edited: