Music streaming is finally bigger than downloads
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Music streaming is finally bigger than downloads

  1. #1
    Ketch12
    Guest

    Music streaming is finally bigger than downloads


  2. #2
    Not good news for the music industry, because they make less money on streaming. Therefore, they will turn up the pressure for streaming royalty increases.

  3. #3
    I'm going to toss out an observation for all you music experts to ponder:

    I am guessing downloads are losing the race because the music consumers of today (let's call them 'Twerps') are looking for the latest, greatest and "coolest" music and are very quick to toss yesterday's hits in the bit bucket. Unlike the Old Days where music classics (all the way from Standards to Metal) continued to be played on several genres of classic music stations. That has yet to happen across the nation with "new" music yet and I'm not sure it will have a market if and when someone tries it out.

    In a related, but somewhat disjoint topic, I am continually amazed that American Idol uses so many classic songs in its programming. The audience (mostly made up of Twerps) seems to know most of those songs even as they are not the perfect material for the performers. Were I a performer I would not want to be compared to a very popular artist of yesterday by covering his/her music.

  4. #4
    My sense is that just about everything tactile is disposable for Gen Y. Besides music, that includes cars, homes, furniture, and other worldly possessions. People are important. Things are not. Music downloads and CDs are things. The only exception I can see is the phone, and it's because the phone is their connection to people. So if you can enjoy music with your friends, and not be burdened with the weight of that music, either in terms of CDs or the memory they take up, it's all good.
    Last edited by TheBigA; 05-16-2015 at 05:10 PM.

  5. #5
    I would wager it's the overall 'free' nature of streaming that makes it popular with Generation Y.

    It's not free to the services, but free to many (most?) of the users.

    Downloads cost money, unless they're pirated. Streaming doesn't have to cost anything to be free (legally).

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by landtuna View Post
    I'm going to toss out an observation for all you music experts to ponder:

    I am guessing downloads are losing the race because the music consumers of today (let's call them 'Twerps') are looking for the latest, greatest and "coolest" music and are very quick to toss yesterday's hits in the bit bucket. Unlike the Old Days where music classics (all the way from Standards to Metal) continued to be played on several genres of classic music stations. That has yet to happen across the nation with "new" music yet and I'm not sure it will have a market if and when someone tries it out.

    In a related, but somewhat disjoint topic, I am continually amazed that American Idol uses so many classic songs in its programming. The audience (mostly made up of Twerps) seems to know most of those songs even as they are not the perfect material for the performers. Were I a performer I would not want to be compared to a very popular artist of yesterday by covering his/her music.
    You were doing fine until you inserted (let's call them 'Twerps'). Congrats on blowing your credibility. Again.
    Last edited by JeffM; 05-17-2015 at 01:28 PM.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by boombox4 View Post

    It's not free to the services, but free to many (most?) of the users.
    That's the problem. It promotes music as free. That's the wrong message. If you want to hear music done your way, you should pay for it.

    Thus the music industry is opposed to free ad-supported streaming, and is encouraging streamers to offer it as a paid subscription service.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBigA View Post
    That's the problem. It promotes music as free. That's the wrong message. If you want to hear music done your way, you should pay for it.

    Thus the music industry is opposed to free ad-supported streaming, and is encouraging streamers to offer it as a paid subscription service.
    Are they opposed to radio too? I don't see how they can have it both ways.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by semoochie View Post
    Are they opposed to radio too? I don't see how they can have it both ways.
    They want the same kind of royalty for broadcast radio as streaming.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Ney York City
    Posts
    178
    i find that not true at all, the kids today have very poor communication skills....and they only text.....can you a actually hold an intelligent conversation with a 20 year old today.... do you know of any that could host a radio show?

    People are important. Things are not.
    Last edited by Richard Stefan; 05-20-2015 at 09:35 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




     
Our Conferences
Useful Contacts
Community


Contact Us